Aoccdrnig to a rscheearch at an Elingsh uinervtisy, it deosn’t mttaer in waht oredr the ltteers in a wrod are, the olny iprmoetnt tihng is taht frist and lsat ltteer is at the rghit pclae. The rset can be a toatl mses and you can sitll raed it wouthit porbelm. Tihs is bcuseae we do not raed ervey lteter by it slef but the wrod as a wlohe.
I think “without problem” is exaggerating, since I had to think a bit about it, but I was certainly able to read the OP. I think context is a big help, too.
That is very interesting. So, to combine this with what we’ve learned in the WHY CAN’T I WRITE LIKE THIS ALL THE TIME YOU FASCISTS thread, that would make consistently misspelled text easier to read than all-caps text? Fascinating.
This is very istnerenitg. Heevowr, some people do read letters squeallintney, rather than rozincege a block of letters in one psas. They may not do so well.
but you didn’t switch around “a” and “to”. Oh, wait.
I wonder how many of the letters have to be in the correct order, or in the correct place holder (besides the first letter) in order to recognize the word.
I, too, initially only saw the word “weird” as being spelled wrong.
Yeah, Liz, I don’t get that one either. Which brings up a good point. . .that we may only recognize the words because we’re familiar enough with them that we know what they should be? A more difficult, uncommon, or longer word would cause problems, as I would assume it would also if you didn’t learn to read the words the way they are supposed to be written in the first place.
I certainly noticed more than one “typo” in the title, but the one that absolutely jumped out at me was “relaly.”