You tried, Cervaise.
In fact, upon further reading and analyzation - I agree with you.
I’m done with the wize-cracks. This is giving me the heebie-jeebies.
LOL!!! That’s a good one. Got some more jokes?
I really don’t care what their reason is for looking at this thread, as long as the hit counter at my site stays constantly in motion, I know I’m doing something right.
Plus this is not the only place the link to my site is posted.
I also leave links to this thread, so those who have no trouble seeing these anomalies, can see for themselves how many people there are who don’t want this reality to become known, and the levels they will stoop to in order to accomplish their devious goals.
http://www.picturetrail.com/gallery/view?username=seethruart
This is one reality no one can stop. It will steam roll anyone who gets in the way.
Seethruart
SeeThruArt is the steamroller to our Judge Doom…
Luckily, i am a 'Toon, and steamrollers cannot hurt me!
I worked in mental health in Washington State and Massachusetts. In those states, and some others, mere delusional belief is not enough for involuntary hospitalization. The standard in those states is that the person must at risk of harm to self (suicidal or delusional “if I jump out the window, angels will protect me”), harm to others (“my mother is a Martian imposter and must be killed”), or gravely disabled (unable to provide for their daily needs - this is often strictly limited as well).
I don’t intend to hijack this into a discussion of mental health laws. But before anyone assumes that involuntary hospitalization is easy in their state, they should get the correct information.
The truth and the reality are the steamroller. I’m just one of the people you will see driving it.
Seethruart
The only ones who suffer from delusions here (not to mention denial), are the ones posting these types of messages.
Seethruart
I see you skipped more posts, cherry picking whom to answer is the best way to alienate a future jury. Again the courts will certify that your talk is cheap one. You have not checked the negatives and you have only blurry (fake) pictures enhanced by you.
And I showed that you are lying even in your exposition of your facts, Nobody here or in the courts will think that you are right in your assumption that children will read in 5 years about the faked Apollo missions (want to bet on it?). You do not care what we say; unfortunately virtually all here can spot a fraud when we see one and our posts can not be erased by you, everybody else does read them and compares them to yours, everybody thinks you are not doing it right. The future generations will do the same.
The current generation is actually worried about you, please seek help.
Maybe it’s just all the conspiracy nut propaganda starting to sink in but I’m beginning to think that this guy is a plant from NASA to provide a story so insane that we will have to believe the opposite as sane people (but not me!)…
They are using that martin reverse psychology on me and it isn’t going to work! I need to get my tin foil hat to protect me.
But seriously… this has been the MOST entertaining thread I have read to date. Just lurking around until a Mod locks it down, or for the tennis/golf hijack to happen.
Nicholas
Just because a person can think for himself doesn’t necessarily mean he can do it well.
[Stereotypical Canadian]
So, how about that Tiger Woods, eh?
[/Stereotypical Canadian]
So far, none of you have disproven anything. The only conspiracy theories in this thread are the ones participants create to make this terrible reality go away. “It must be a conspiracy!” you shout. “NASA would never lie!” you yell. My God people what kind of sedatives do they have you on?
Do you not think others have eyes?
Trying to trivialize it is just a devious little debunker tactic that has been all worn out. You people deny everything. You deny obvious and blatant things. You deny too much. You have to admit to something every now and then to be believable. I guess they forgot to teach that lesson in debunker training.
I guess the worst part about this is, once you see it, no matter how hard you deny it publically, you will not be able to forget it. There is something about this reality that stays with you.
I really had no choice other than to tell others about it. It would have eaten me alive otherwise (you will all find that out for yourselves).
Getting grilled by clueless debunkers is a whole lot better than the alternative.
Seethruart
Nor have you proven anything.
Actuially as a scientist I should be looking at this with open eyes and an open mind… sorry for the humor injected, it was uncalled for.
As for your topic… I have seen the photos and do have a bit of experience with digital image enlargment. How are you making up for the lost resolution from the actuial photo. I’ll admit that you have good high quality pictures but they are still nowhere near hi resolution photos.
I am also intrigued by this unifying theory of the universe that you have derived… if you would be willing to share instead of just eluding to it I would be most grateful and promise to look at it with a completly open scientific mind.
Hower you have been avoiding direct questions for some time now so I doubt that I’ll get a reply… and when a person dosen’t support their claims with open debate those claims tend to fall appart with out direct support…
Nicholas
Actually, the photographic evidence proves my theory. I can pretty much put this steam roller on auto pilot and take a nap while it rolls all over you and the others here who are incapable of being forthright. Because of thart, I believe you are the proper representatives for NASA.
http://www.picturetrail.com/gallery/view?username=seethruart
Seethruart
Did you inject some humor? I must have missed it.
The types and the multitude of anomalies I am pointing out don’t simply “appear” in a photo. IT’S THE ENTIRE GROUND IN EVERY PHOTO FROM EVERY APOLLO MISSION FOR CRYING OUT LOUD!!! This is no random occurance, and that is what your theory is referring to.
I guess as a scientist, you really don’t know much about “open eyes and open mind” do you? It sounded good though, didn’t it?
Seethruart
Not quite… even the best data has to have expinations and theory backing it up. I coud present graphs and charts from the work I have done and it would be meaningless unless I supported it. That is what you are dooing, presenting data (photos) and then dancing around the atempts to discuss that data. You may call it debunking but all revolutionary theories have gone through this process.
If you do want anyone to take this seriously… stand up and defend your theories.
Nicholas
Scientific graphs and charts are a FAR CRY from photographic evidence, son.
You, in your scientific capacity, can call photographic EVIDENCE anything you want, but even in your scientific capacity, you can not change the fact that it is photographic EVIDENCE. Not just any photographic evidence, but official US Government/NASA photographic evidence. That puts your little charts and graphs and data in the dust (where it belongs).
I believe more truth has been silenced in your bogus scientific process than, anything else. There is definately nothing revolutionary going on now. Most of you turn a blind eye to any idea that doesn’t fit into your cozy little “unsubstantiated” theories.
Son, I am letting the evidence defend itself. If people don’t take this seriously (many already do take it seriously), it will only hurt them, not me (because they will continue to let themselves be led by a pack of liars). There are no scientists on earth these days who could tell me anything, and expect me to believe it. I’ve seen bogus earth science for what it is…a crock of dung. Coming on this board as a scientist holds no weight with me, nor does it change the reality of the faked apollo photos.
Seethruart
So you’re saying that this photo and this photo were both taken from high altitude? (In reality, only the first image was taken from high altitude.)
And you really think the Old Man of the Mountain in New Hampshire might be artificial, a sculpture, like Mount Rushmore? So who carved the Old Man, pray tell, if it was known even to the Indians who lived there even before Leif Erickson crossed the Atlantic?
I take it you are of the belief that, earth humans are the only intelligent life in the galaxy, and there was never anyone on this earth before the indians.
I guess that would explain your naivety.
Seethruart
So all I need to prove a theory is a photograph?
I urge you to look into the “faerie” hoax perpetrated by two adolescent girls, in which they used paper cutouts to fool hundreds of people that they had fairies traipsing around their back yard. Even Sir Arthur Conan Doyle, respected author of the Sherlock Holmes stories, was taken by their charade. And they had the original physical photographs to back up their claims.
So you’re asking us to believe your claim that the Apollo moon landing was a hoax based on digital copies of photos you’ve never had physical copies of? And I’m not referring to even your best digital scan as printed on the best printer you can lay your hands on. I’m talking about the original prints - the ones that were scanned to produce the images on your website.
My point is this: You say that you’ve proved your theory by offering photographic evidence, which is unassailable even in a court of law. Yet, hoaxes have been propagated based on so-called unassailable photographic evidence, using images that were better then yours! How are we to believe you, unless you disprove our theory that we did in fact send men to the moon and took pictures as we walked around? The onus of proof is on you, not on us.
Scott