I agree completely! Those damn shock doctors lie! I don’t care what they say, bilateral, monolateral, reduced voltage, whatever, it’s still destructive of healthy brain tissue and it’s still not safe! ECT should be a restricted category treatment and should most definitely not be prescribed willy-nilly!
Why don’t they at least rule out other causes, other ailments, and holistic alternative treatments bef-
That’s the one that chaps my tits (so to speak) - alot. I pretty much lose all respect for someone’s opinion when they toss one of those into a post. Grammar nazi? Moi?
[QUOTE=MrSquishy]
It’s “etc.” It’s short for “et cetera”, which is Latin for “and others”.
[/QUOTE]
Huh, I thought it was Chicagan for Peter Cetera. Now I know.
[QUOTE=featherlou]
Is that like those guages they use to measure stuff, Nanoda? (Okay, in all fairness, that’s a word that looks wrong both ways.)
[/QUOTE]
Don’t it though?
My current bugaboo (although** ect. **is a longstanding major one) is “tounge.” Man, I actually have to apply Carmex to both tits after that one. Literally.
[QUOTE=MrSquishy]
It’s “etc.” It’s short for “et cetera”, which is Latin for “and others”.
[/QUOTE]
[very slight nitpick] It’s Latin for “and others of the same kind”, which is different from “et alii/et aliae/et alia”, Latin for “and others.”[/very slight nitpick]
[QUOTE=h.sapiens]
I suspect that many people who spell it “ect” also pronounce it “eck-setter-a”. Which is an even bigger peeve of mine.
[/QUOTE]
And I gotta axe you: How hard is it for people to pronunciate words correctly?