Wasn’t it a day or two later?
Anyway, my initial suspicion, and my continued suspicion, is that it was either wishful thinking related to coincidental natural sounds, or it was some other vessel in the area (or even far beyond it, maybe even on the surface for all I know) making similarly coincidental noise that the sonobuoys detected.
Something to understand about sound in water is that it tends not to travel in a straight line, can often end up getting trapped bouncing between different layers of ocean (due to temperature and salinity differences in particular) and so moves unpredictably.
When, for example, we would conduct sonar operations on two of my sonar-capable ships, we would actually deploy instruments, either *expendable or recoverable, to actually drop down into the water and provide information on “layers” so that we could get a sense of how sound might behave at that particular area of ocean at that particular time.
All that to say, it’s a science, but not, as of yet, an exact science.
For similar reasons, I would caveat an earlier comment up thread about having continuous communications during a dive as a matter of course: first, I read in another article that on an earlier dive there were several hours where they could not, in fact, communicate. But I don’t consider that to necessarily be a foreboding sign of poor craftsmanship in and of itself. Rather, it is entirely possible for everything to be working perfectly, and yet not be able to have communications between a submerged object and the surface, because while you might think it’s just a straight line of a few hundred, at most a few thousand, feet between them, once you have different layers of water (differing conditions of temperature and salinity) between the two, the signals might not penetrate, or if they do, they could be degraded to the point of being indiscernible.
*ETA: See, for example,
https://oceanexplorer.noaa.gov/facts/xbt.html