Everytime i pass by one of their settlements, usually along the motorway (which, I agree, is no place for anyone to live, but experience has shown us they also do not necessarily leave their camping spots in pristine conditions), I note that the majority of them drive or inhabit mentioned cars/caravans.
I’ve also been told they don’t pay any tax. At all. I don’t know whether this is true or not? Could someone clear that up for me?
[/quote]
The problem with the camping spots is that there isn’t enough of the facilities available, as every NIMBY makes sure their council won’t allow them, and the ones that do exist aren’t nearly adequate enough to deal with the people who stay there. there is one facility on the outskirts of swords that is kept immaculate, has no trouble with the locals or the police, but they will all be evicted in the next few months because the owner died and his wife hasn’t the ability to manage the site anymore, and the council won’t buy the site from her. Instead, the tenants will me evicted and new houses built on the property.
Few of the existing sites provide skips, and businesses aren’t allowed to provide skips to illegal settlements.
** where do all these stories come from of houses being provided for travellers, and they wrecking them, of camping sites being provided, and they wrecking them or leaving them in appaling states? Are those all biased and untrue? There is a lot of animosity between the residentials and the travellers, and misconceptions of each by the other only spurns on the dislike between them. It’s the way politics are being done, in this country, I think. Politicians needs to be popular in order to get elected. Nobody wants travellers in their backyard, hence the politicians make it undesirable for the travellers to stay in the politican’s constituancy, they are popular, they get elected, and the situation deteriorates. So what do you propose the government do about it? or the people even, for that matter?**
Its a question of who should make the first step. If you were a member of the Travelling community who’s been shit on by local and national government, the media and the public for as long as you can remember, what would you do? **
[/QUOTE]
i wouldn’t be happy. And i’d be very stubborn, and demand justice. But as I stated above, acting like that, is, in the long run not going to help them. It only reinforces the negative image a lot of people already have of them. Education, education, education.
All three parties.
Look at the Roma in Slovakia. The government there gave them a nature reserve where a limited number of them can live, provided they keep it clean. It seems to work.
I think the nature reserve is called “Slovakian Paradise”. There a few nature reserves in Slovakia.
I think in Romania, they still herd sheep (in the summer) and live in peace with bears and wolves.
So, in your opinion, the government should take the first step.
How, and what?
