Is it possible that people feel if they look full on into the face of evil, in it’s every form, with no shying away or denial, that somehow it might serve to protect them and theirs?
As in, if I am aware I will be better prepared for that worst case scenario awaiting me in some distant, as yet unimagined, future.
I disagree. I think that in the dog thread, there were plenty of people being reasonable, mixed in among the people being unreasonable; and the reasonable people included those who did and did not find it funny.
There’s plenty of polarization hereabouts, but I think we serve ourselves well by attempting to remain reasonable, and pointing out the silly polarization when it occurs.
I like Excalibre’s take on this. We old folk have seen it all and heard of it all. I’d wager a dollar against a dime that it’s the younger people who congregate over this stuff and react with “Oh my god, you mean this kind of stuff happens!? :eek:”
The fact is that if you pit anything animal or kid related you’re going to take a beating. The unreasonable responses (or rather, the fanatical ones) are generally the result of a misconstrued OP. I have one pitting that’s animal related and one MPSIMS that’s kid related. In both cases I think the meaning was misconstrued by several folks who decided to ream me out.
The pitting could’ve used some more background, granted. I was taking calls in a tv station that was running a story about the incident and got several earfuls of crap from people. None the less, people (I’m no innocent myself) have a tendency to overreact.
As for animal advocates going overboard, may I take this opportunity to recalibrate everyone’s scale?
I got a call last week from a woman infuriated at something she’d seen on television. “I couldn’t believe the cruelty toward animals!” the woman almost shouted at me, “and I want to do something about it!”
I asked her whether it was on a local channel on a national, and she told me it was animal cruelty on national TV. “What happened?” I asked.
“It was a news show,” she told me, “showing a herd of cattle caught in a flood. And the poor things were trying to swim to safety, and the reporter said, ‘It looks like they’re trying to moooooooove on out of there!’ I couldn’t believe her callous attitude!”
I gave her the number for HSUS and managed not to laugh until I’d hung up.
Anyway, that’s what I consider an overreaction. Feeling horrified when looking at a photograph of a badly injured animal? Not such an overreaction.
I’ve worked in customer service for a good long time, probably too long in fact. I know that customers suck eggs and that I should not be surprised when they do something rude and/or stupid. They still get to me sometimes. If I were more of the :mad: sort, I suppose I’d have started a thread or two about it.
Then there is the persons first real encounter with said problem: the normally smart owner of local sports team trades a popular player, you encounter your first jackass on Ebay, you have your first hideous breakup, and the like.
And let’s not get started on repeated themes on an internet message board. If we cut out the repeat threads on this board, I think there may be as many as 50 threads or so left. Now that I think about it, that might not be a badidea. They could start giving the hamsters some time off.
To address the op, some days the shit just catches you the wrong way (could shit hit you the right way?). Some days some things just blow your mind and you need to vent. It happens. People post. The board goes on. The only ones that get me are the ones that lack a sense of humor and feel a need to shit on the humor of others.
I like a good explanantion of the event horizon and sub atomic particle theory as much as the next guy… but not 24/7. Human events and their moral impacts are what human interactions are mostly all about. Should we eschew them to the exclusivity of loftier and more erudite subjects? I suggest you try it and let us know how popular you are at the next party.
I agree that a single individual bringing up these subjects repeatedly becomes sounding like a broken record and a depressing bastard to boot. However, people get caught up in weak or impressionable moments and they need to express their outrage. Even if it’s slightly displaced. It’s the human part of us. Not always rational but hopefully expressive.
Besides, if it weren’t for these moments of weakness, you’d never get the chance to feel morally superior.
Insist on new and astonishing themes and insights for every thread and post, and pretty soon all activity here will cease except for an occasional burp from Gaudere.
No, it would only be a slur if the picture showed cattle caught in a flood, and the voiceover said, “Coming up in our next segment - questions persist about the legitimacy of the 2000 Presidential election…”