Here in the northeast USA, we have basically two kinds of flush toilets, at least to this non-plumber.
In one, there is a tank of water which provides a convenient place to lean one’s body while sitting. Flushing the toilet empties this tank into the bowl to wash everything away, and then it refills for the next user.
In the other, there is no tank at all, and leaning back is not comfortable. Flushing simply opens a valve which allows a preset amount of water out of the building pipes and into the bowl. The valve then closes on its own. I can see several advantages to this setup: It seems like a less complicated contraption, with fewer moving parts, and fewer parts in general, which ought to make for a cheaper price. Also, there is no time delay waiting for the tank to refill, and big messes can be flushed repeatedly, in much less time.
My question is this:
From what I have seen, private homes use the tank type exclusively almost without exception, and commercial buildings (offices, stores, factories) use the pipe-and-valve type the great majority of the time (the exceptions tend to be in the smaller businesses).
Why the discrepancy? I would think it quite simple to get rid of the tank from home toilets. Move the valve from the back to the side, and the whole toilet could be moved a little closer to the wall, making a roomier bathroom and a smooth wall to lean against. The toilet would be cheaper than what we have now, and no one will need to ever replace the rubber floater stuff inside the tank.
Any ideas? The only thing I can think of is that these pipe-valve things are too dangerous or tricky to install except in buildings which have a full-time maintenance person. Can that be it?