Tom Dark is/was Cecil Adams

I enjoy reading old posts on occasion, especially those riddled with controversy, name-calling, and other confrontational writing.

After reading several threads in which Tom Dark attempted to enlighten via insult-laden, incredibly sarcastic, while sometimes intelligent-sounding (I stress ‘sounding’), seemingly logical (again, stress ‘seemingly’) postings, I came to this conclusion:

Tom Dark is/was actually Cecil Adams in disguise.

(Gasps from the crowd, even murmurs of ‘blasphemy’ are heard)

I reason thus: despite his misguided ideas, he was incredibly gifted at insults and sarcasm, which caused his writing to be very enjoyable, at least to me, to read. Just like Cecil’s.

Normally, Cecil wouldn’t actually try to spread ignorance. He is, of course, devoted to fighting it. But he did it knowing full well that no right-minded Straight Doper would buy it.

But why? Well, it was a grand, well-orchestrated maneuver, I must admit, but I saw through it. You see, Cecil was preparing for a time when he needed a dupe. A fall guy. A diversion.

By posting his ideas that conflicted with Cecil’s, he created the illusion of a bad guy. With the sarcasm and wit of a Cecil, Tom became the perfect anti-hero, the Lex Luther to Cecil’s Superman, the Dr. Doom to Cecil’s Fantastic Four, the Dan Quayle to Cecil’s George Bush. And who better to create the anti-hero, than the hero himself?

And lo, the time to use this carefully created persona arrived. Cecil needed to gather some information about the Dopers to use as advertising statistics. Knowing that some people might not be prone to providing such information, he produces Tom Dark, super-villain.

“He does not exist,” says Tom, on cue, “Do not provide your information!” And, to facilitate Tom’s eventual needed exit, Cecil has Tom attempt to zing a moderator or two.

So in swoops Ed et al, the rest of the Legion of Super-dopers, to bring down the mighty villain. Cecil benefits from what appears to be attacks from a no-gooder, looking the better man in the process. And those lurkers who were previously scared to come forth with their info are beckoned forth by the good feelings of seeing the villain routed by the hero. Plan fulfilled. A plan so well implemented, the likes of which would not be seen for some time, until the Republicans pulled off a similar feat with a timely leaking of Dubya’s DUI arrest.

The man is truly a genious. All evidence that he truly is ‘the smartest man on earth.’

It is amazing what flows to the keyboard when a mind is bored.

Actually, I wrote this because I hoped someone who reads this could tell me why ‘Tom Dark’ was banned and could point me to the posts that resulted in him being banned. Although I enjoy DavidB and others’ well contructed, intelligent posts, sometimes I enjoy zingy, sarcastic writings of those attempting to argue points that I don’t necessarily agree with.

I’d always wondered about that.

Tom Dark, eh?

Do you have some links supporting your thesis?

We’re still fighting ignorance, after all.

I’m assuming this is all tongue-in-cheek, right? If Cecil wants to post as someone who is insulting, sarcastic, and intelligent-sounding, he doesn’t need to create a sock puppet to do so.

I think that you overestimate the impact Tom Dark may have had on the boards. I also think you overestimate the impact the survey had. There weren’t that many people who were bent out of shape over it. Cecil had no need to frighten us into filling it out, no need for a “stalking horse”. It wasn’t that important.

And it was all such a very long time ago…Sheesh. :rolleyes:

You want to know why the estimable Mr. Dark was banned. Here’s page 3 of a Comments thread from last summer in which someone challenged Cecil to an astrology test (a gauntlet he did not deign to pick up) and in which TD was unspeakably rude to Arnold, of all people. The last post is (I’m assuming) TubaDiva’s official boot.

And it’s dated September 10, MONTHS after the whole survey thing was Old News and off our plates.

http://boards.straightdope.com/sdmb/showthread.php?threadid=34269&pagenumber=3

Is this Trash Arnold Winkelried Week or what?

Well, criminy, this being the MPSIMS and all I hardly expected a David B’ish smite with the request of actual evidence for my wild accusations.

However, who am I to deny a moderator.

For an example of Tom’s sarcastic and entertaining writing, I profer this: http://boards.straightdope.com/sdmb/showthread.php?threadid=720&pagenumber=2

Please note the posting on 1/4/2000, at 8:01 PM. I will admit that his writing style isn’t necessarily as witty as Cecil’s, but a slight deviation from one’s writing style would hardly require much effort from one as brilliant as Cecil. I would also point out the flawed logic of some Tom’s assertions, flaws Cecil undoubtedly added intentionally so as to not deceive true Straight Doper’s.

As for evidence that Dan Quayle was George Bush’s Lex Luther, I am too lazy to find a link to the '92 Presidential election results. One might suggest that Ross Perot was actually Bush’s Lex Luther, but I would further assert that Dan Quayle was actually Ross Perot in disguise, playing a fool on purpose to intentionally sabotage Bush’s chances. Please don’t request links to prove this assertion. Suffice it to say, my source requested to remain nameless and I must comply for fear of painful death.

As for evidence of Tom playing the anti-hero, please refer to:
http://boards.straightdope.com/sdmb/showthread.php?threadid=1946

Note Tom even goes so far as to suggest Cecil doesn’t even exist. Playing the anti-hero to the ‘T’, in full denial mode, the villain claims the hero is a figment of someone’s imagination. I’m sure to butcher the quote, but you’ve probably heard it, something like ‘The greatest trick the devil ever pulled was getting everyone to believe he didn’t exist.’ If that’s a great trick, imagine how much more effective it would be if the villain tricked everyone into believing that the hero didn’t exist.

The rest of the proof of my assertions I leave to the readers as mental exercises of logic. Remember to stretch first.

Nice cover, assert tongue-in-cheek, then follow up with a refute of my logic. Cover both sides.

Of course this was tongue-in-cheek. I had hoped that the content itself screamed as much, but in case it hadn’t, I added this little tidbit:

I will forgive you, however, because I realize I added no smiley faces to the OP.

Apparently adding those are the only way to let people know you are joking. :slight_smile:

Sarcasm and irony historically don’t always come through with pixels only. [shrug]

I always add a “available in sarcasm-impaired format” disclaimer to my posts, if I’m not sure people will “get it”.

What was Mr. Dark’d first name in The October Country?

Perhaps it is because of the Tom Dark’s of the SDMB world that outlandish, crazy sounding ideas aren’t easily identified as being sarcasm or jokes. A bit of the ‘Boy Who Cried Wolf’ syndrome maybe?

I must admit that I was severely disappointed in the post that got Tom Dark banned. With all his fire and brimstone, he got banned for telling a moderator to eat rabbit turds?

After reading so many of his posts, I was kind of hoping for a real whizbanger, in which he managed to ridicule several moderators as well as being incredibly nasty with sarcasm. Was there a bigger history between Tom and Arnold that wasn’t represented well in that thread?

I would like to say that I had no intention of turning this week into Trash Arnold W. Week. I don’t know Arnold personally, and I’m sure he did nothing to deserve being told to eat rabbit turds.

Oh, it was a joke. Right.

I wholehartedly apologise for not remembering every single troll that ever graced these fine boards.