Tooth docs: Flouride gel for $45 a gyp?

Can you think of any term that is universally offensive? If not, why even make a point that this term isn’t?

I thought it was the reference to the blood of Abraham that was going to set people off.

I got these fluoride treatments all the time as a kid. My current dentist has me brushing with a leave-in fluoride gel after I brush my teeth. My teeth are an ongoing disaster, and I’ve basically funded her kids’ college education, so she gives me the gel at no charge.

I see what you did there! You thought nobody’d catch your flipping “criticism” out there as a slur against the good people of Crete who stereotypically have nothing nice to say about foreigners.

Pig.

I have to assume you overlooked the cites to the dictionary that do not refer to it being a slur. That is not subjective evidence, it’s objective.

Care to offer any facts to support your position?

You answered your first question with your second question there, partner.

You seriously need a cite that gyp is offensive?

Ok, here you go.

Encarta® World English Dictionary [North American Edition] © 2009:

(that seems to contradict your assertion that no dictionary lists it as offensive)

More cites:

List of Offensive Words That Should be Avoided
http://zoklet.net/totse//en/ego/literary_genius/terms.html

Banished words: the deeper meaning of slurs
http://news.medill.northwestern.edu/chicago/news.aspx?id=99531&print=1

What’s fine for some hurts for others
http://blogs.chron.com/aboutchron/archives/2005/07/_even_when_its.html

Al Sharpton on ‘Jewing the Numbers’
http://www.hopeofisrael.net/component/content/article/45-israel-news/465-al-sharpton-on-jewing-the-numbers.html

I can easily find a lot more cites. Your assertion that gyp is not offensive is, based on this rather huge number of easily obtained cites, downright silly.

Can we stop this pointless train wreck of a hijack now? This was supposed to be a thread about teeth. I honestly do not understand why you keep going on about this.

Sometimes? I’m supposed to rely upon that as definitive? And then you use blogs for a cite? You’re correct, we’re done here. I’ll stick with my dictionary, you stick with your blogs. I find it ironic you admit jerry-rig is no longer a pejorative towards Germans but insist that gyp is a pejorative towards Gypsies.

You helped steered this thread off the cliff, and now you want someone else to stop?

On the other hand, it was interesting to find out the meaning of hocus-pocus.

To this day i can’t hear “Hocus Pocus” without hearing Bugs Bunny’s volley of incantations: “Abra Cadabra! Hocus Pocus! Abra Capocus! Pocus Cadabra!”

So he should rephrase is as was he jewed?

From the OED:

So it’s certainly not clear that it’s a reference to the Roma(ni). However, I distinctly remember the phrase “thieving gypsy” being common among my peers as a boy, and I don’t think they’re being oversensitive given the probability that it is a reference to them.

Not at all.

My point is that the argument “this is not universally offensive” is no justification for anything, because nothing is universally offensive, including the things that all the people in this thread might happen to agree as being deeply offensive (and some other people elsewhere might not).

Isn’t that a term that limeys use?

Thank you, thank you.
best wishes,
hh