Ah yes, let’s examine the anti-Marcel “evidence”:
He’s Arrogant. He’s a specialist, there’s no denying it, and he thinks quite highly of his skill and knowledge, but have we ever seen him overtly assert “I’m better than you; I could teach you a thing or two” to one of the other contestants? No. But we have seen Ilan do that (“Blah blah travel blah blah paprika!”). Quite laughably, we’ve seen that Ilan can mock foams but he can’t actually do them, and would anyone else have known how to pull off that poi with that special agent that Marcel brought? I doubt it (though again, Sam’s quite comfortable slamming Marcel for it).
Also, has Marcel ever actively questioned the taste or judgment of the judges? He’s always stood by his food and defended his choices, but he hasn’t actually accused them of having inadequate palates the way Elia has in interviews several times.
He’s immature and rude. I won’t question that he’s been portrayed as inconsiderate sometimes in the kitchen, but most of the examples we’ve been fed are incidents that appear rather benign that people get all in a tizzy over. His “barking” at Betty. :rolleyes: The moving of the toiletries–which, uncool as that might’ve been, certainly didn’t merit getting yelled in the face and threatened with a beating.
In fact, Marcel has never raised his voice and has almost never shown any real anger (except, you know, after being attacked!). Since Bravo’s edit seems to favor as much anti-Marcel business as possible, we would think they would eat that up. Ilan, Sam, and Frank? Sure, but never Marcel. The biggest argument seems to be that he’s not much of a team player and won’t help the others the way they think he should. Fine, but the reaction to that, the payback invoked for that, is so much more immature, petty, and mean-spirited that it blows his “sins” into sharp relief.
Have we ever seen him do anything mean or overtly hostile? We’ve seen Ilan slam his food in front of dinner guests (could you get more unprofessional?). We’ve seen his sexuality mocked in a way reminiscent of grade school behavior. We’ve seen him actually help Betty only to have her blame him in front of the judges for something that was his fault. Has he ever thrown anyone under the bus? He did question Sam’s leadership skills–but even then, it wasn’t so much that Sam was a bad leader but not much of a leader one way or the other. So points off for having the political savvy of a turnip, but I don’t remember him verbally attacking anyone in remote proportion to how he’s been attacked.
And let’s get to that assault, since this is something that hasn’t been addressed here: that Bravo very clearly edited the attack to spin as favorable a light on the attackers as possible. Want proof? If you watched that episode, you were led to believe that Ilan & Elia shaved their own heads, and then decided to shave Marcel’s–essentially, the spirit of goofiness led to a “prank” that “went too far”. As it turns out, it didn’t happen that way. What happened was that they assaulted Marcel first, and after escaping and holing himself in the bathroom, then they shaved their own heads. So remember all the laughing and horseplay while shaving their heads? That was after the assault. Instead of a spontaneous lark, now their head-shaving plays like a CYA maneuver to diminish their culpability. And I have yet to have seen an interview by Cliff or Ilan (the one we hear encouraging Sam to continue the assault while Cliff has Marcel pinned down) to apologize and acknowledge the assault for what it was. It wasn’t a “joke” or a “prank” or “rough-housing”, it was an unequivocal attack with only the most vile of intentions–to humiliate Marcel and get off on doing it. How’s that for “maturity”? Also, if Bravo was honest, they would’ve included the behind-the-scenes business of Tom wanting to cut all 4 loose, but getting trumped by the producers. Cliff still seems surprised that he got let go because of something he probably considers “fine print”, not sheer ugliness & indecency.
He’s passive-agressive. Just like obscenity, the thing that’s hard to finger but “I know it when I see it.” Marcel has been accused of this, but the only example anyone ever gives is the discount example–and not only is that a judgment call, but it was about keeping the players accountable to the rules! You want passive-agressive? How about Sam stirring the shit with Frank about the toiletries while Marcel is trying to prep his food? How about Ilan persuading Elia to “narc” on Marcel for…what exactly, again? Marcel may not be hostile, but he isn’t afraid of being confrontational when people around him pull that bullshit. Sam interviews about the assault, “The situation got uncomfortable for everyone”. What fucking horseshit! We see in the tape that Sam is laughing, Ilan is goading him to finish what they came in to do, and Elia doing zippola to help her “friend”. In all the interviews I’ve read, it’s always “You had to be there” and “He’s worse than you think”, but the real passive-agressive ones are the clique that seemed to feed off the need to keep that hostility toward Marcel stoked–to the extent that they’ll justify just about anything they do.
He’s got zero social skills. Yup, I’ll give you that completely. It’s probably been a vicious circle–he doesn’t know how to talk to or relate to people (or it’s simply not important to him), so people ostracize him, so he builds up these defense mechanisms, which distance him from others, who he continues to not know how to talk or relate to, etc. I don’t doubt for a second that he probably gets on people’s nerves, that jokes he makes fall flat, that he hasn’t got the filter necessary to speak his mind without it coming out the wrong way, and that all that is secondary anyway to his mission there: proving to be the best. But Stephen and Tiffany were more insufferable the first season, but they were dealing with adults so everyone spoke their mind without resorting to kindergarten theatrics. In real life Marcel may be a full-blown prick, but I’d still rather hang out with him over that douchebag Ilan.
He should’ve been kicked out long ago. I’ll try to find it, but TWoP had a breakdown of Best & Worst showing in both sets of challenges by the top 4, and they were all pretty even except for Sam, who was clearly in the lead in combined wins. So I won’t argue that Sam should’ve been picked before Señor Tool, but there isn’t quite so much evidence on Marcel performing worse than the others with any regularity. Ultimately, this is a hard thing to assess because we can’t actually eat things as viewers, but the only thing I remember the judges calling genuinely inedible (as opposed to “undercooked”) was Sam’s watermelon monstrosity. I’ll also agree that the judges seem bizarrely inconsistent about taking risks/securing execution, but Marcel has consistently shown he’s amongst the best platers there and one who’s more willing to come out of left field with something than most.
I’ve never been a big fan of Marcel’s, but I’ve gradually grown to detest the others for being far guiltier of worse things than what he’s done (not to mention their complete lack of any self-awareness about it all–and you want to call Marcel oblivious!) Marcel’s been put through the wringer and he’s always demonstrated professionalism and civility. He may not be a nice guy, and he may not be the best cook (though I doubt one-trick-pony Ilan is either), but he’s earned my respect in the way he’s handled some pretty unconscionable behavior. Here’s hoping for a victory, so Top Chef doesn’t lose any more credibility than it already has.