Most Americans believe in God (not me, but most). Very few believe in your FOTL doctrine. That ought to tell you that it’s not them, it’s you.
The law does not see it either. Your birth certificate does not create a corporate identity separate from your personal identity, and it is the latter that is summoned to appear in court. You can be summoned even if you never had a BC, it makes no legal difference.
No, your rights are granted by the law, which is a different matter from a court of law, and your rights do not pre-exist or predate the law. And there is nothing “lawful but not legal.”
Driving a car without a license is unlawful. There is no distinction between unlawful and illegal.
Posting insults is bad.
Posting insults when one has been told to stop is very bad and earns the poster demerits.
Posting insults that use the same language as the insults for which one has already been Warned suggests that a poster may not be a good fit for this message board.
This is a Warning that you need to stop this behavior.
That’s why you’re supposed to go to school and be educated, so you have come clue how things work.
Have you informed the government that they need to give you that option? Because, from what I can see, everytime one of you FotLers or SC’s attempts to force a court to to treat you as what you call a “natural person” you wind up locked up for contempt of court or some such. I would say your strategy does not seem to be working…
No thank you, I don’t care for [del]Kool Aid[/del] Flavor-Aid
In that case, unless YOUR name was on the fish it wasn’t your fish, either.
Your belief system, which is clearly not universal. And how convenient your god gave you “stewardship” - is that like some primitive tribe that believes it’s OK to steal cattle from others because their god gave them ownership of all cattle?
“Recreational” fishing actually legally distinct from “commercial” fishing. Which you’d know if you bothered to actually read any laws or regulations. Recreational fishing is that done for enjoyment. Commercial fishing is done for profit. The fees for fishing licenses go to protect and where necessary re-stock fish so that the public can continue to enjoy recreational fishing in the future, in other words, to preserve the common good.
Right, the great Jefferson who, although he did many worthy things, also banged his female slaves, owned other human beings - what was that about being created equal? - and like every other human being had flaws and made mistakes.
Absolutely YES his words should be re-examined and questioned. Many of them will hold up to such scrutiny. But saying “oh, he’s so great, you shouldn’t question him!” is not freedom of any sort.
More seriously - is it THAT inconceivable to you that it might be done differently elsewhere than where you live? You talk about the world, but I don’t think you’ve ever traveled much in it.
I recommend that the OP get a copy of Black’s and see that there is no “secret” language, and it is quite well defined. Obscure sometimes, but it is defined.:rolleyes:
Possibly I’d try that on a judge who believes in God. What should I say to a judge who happens to be an atheist? I say “You cannot serve two masters; is your allegiance to these laws, or to Our Father Who Art In Heaven?” And, since he doesn’t believe in the latter, he says “Uh, the former, I guess?”
That’s no problem if there’s crisply-written stuff on the books for me to cite – if I can mention a statute of limitations that ran out, or caselaw about the Miranda warning I didn’t get, or whatever. But what’s my next move if (a) all I have is praise for God, and (b) the guy who can sentence me to prison has no interest in God?
Well, Jefferson wasn’t at the Constitutional Convention (he was in France at the time) and didn’t really approve of the result, saying the Articles of Confederation could’ve been fixed up satisfactorily with a few amendments.
This is starting to become my #1 pet peeve. That’s actually a surprise given the absolutely asinine blather you’ve posted here, but such it is. A capitol is a building. A capita crime is one for which the accused may be subject to the death penalty. Look, we’ve already seen that you have little respect for the language. Just for kicks, try to fix this one thing, okay?