There are topical creams for that now, tomn. See your dermatologist.
Why does this “cite” give me the impression that you’re into the Christian Identity movement?
So his roots are showing, big deal, give him a break.
Wow, straw arguments here too, come on mate.
Anyone who has watched a television show about law enforcement has a heard a police officer read the suspect his or her Miranda Rights. After placing the suspect under arrest, the officer will say something similar to, “**You have the right to remain silent. **Anything you say can and will be used against you in a court of law. You have a right to an attorney. If you cannot afford an attorney, one will be appointed for you.”
ah now we hear the creator of Tommdebb through the created of tommdebb,
First deny there is a creator, Is tommdebb “saying what he is saying” or is Tommdebbs creator saying what tommdebb is saying.
we are existing and communication and adhering to the rules of a society “the straight dope”. you have elected Tommdebb as your sherriff and or government
The person of tommdepp is reprimanding my personn of MarcMcroy.
Same principal, one moment you say I was fractal wrong you allowed fractal realities.
But then deny being a part of one. Is fractal only what you"see" or can it be part of what you is.
Sorry, I don’t indulge willful nonsense unless it’s funny, and this isn’t.
Black’s law does have its root in Latin, I know Latin better that Black’s
“persona” (Latin) or “prosopon” (πρόσωπον: Greek) originally referred to the masks worn by actors on stage. The various masks represented the various “personae” in the stage play.[1]
here
Not talking for **tomndebb **here, but if you are deifying what Jefferson said you have to question your ideas about god supporting your peculiar ideas.
“Question with boldness even the existence of a god; because if there be one he must approve of the homage of reason more than that of blindfolded fear.”
Source: Letter of Thomas Jefferson to Peter Carr, August 10, 1787.
I have asked with boldness and answered in Grace. Once again the powerful words of Mr Jefferson.
here
I have mine . Do you have yours? You can borrow mine, ya know, I like to share.
“whoosh”
I agree, but to be in the place and hold the title of the “conjured”, to do the will of the summoner is not a position to want to be in.
You should know that secularists do love to point at Jefferson’s bible because he removed the divinity stuff and left the view that Jesus was a great teacher, not divine.
http://www.smithsonianmag.com/arts-culture/How-Thomas-Jefferson-Created-His-Own-Bible.html
It is clear however that you want to be the preacher here, that is not good also:
“History, I believe, furnishes no example of a priest-ridden people maintaining a free civil government. This marks the lowest grade of ignorance of which their civil as well as religious leaders will always avail themselves for their own purposes.”
Source: Letter of Thomas Jefferson to Alexander von Humboldt, Dec. 6, 1813.
Sure his words are powerful. And you need to fight your own ignorance.
Right to travel _yessir _I assumed my in_a lien_able. so should you given the opportunity I was not trespassing unless I was warned of the nature of my trespass, No notice No trespass
Why are you people are so afraid of your natural rights?
here
In spite of right-wing Christian attempts to rewrite history to make Jefferson into a Christian, little about his philosophy resembles that of Christianity. Although Jefferson in the Declaration of Independence wrote of the Laws of Nature and of Nature’s God, there exists nothing in the Declaration about Christianity.
Although Jefferson believed in a Creator, his concept of it resembled that of the god of deism (the term “Nature’s God” used by deists of the time). With his scientific bent, Jefferson sought to organize his thoughts on religion. He rejected the superstitions and mysticism of Christianity and even went so far as to edit the gospels, removing the miracles and mysticism of Jesus (see The Jefferson Bible) leaving only what he deemed the correct moral philosophy of Jesus.
Uh-oh, it’s big red font time.
sorry … too loud?.. against T&C contract?
As we have repeatedly pointed out: what natural rights?
You claim they exist. Where’s your evidence they do and what makes them inalienable?
In fact, you have yourself shown examples where you have personally alienated the rights of other people. And there’s no shortage of cases throughout history where people have been deprived of life, liberty, and pretty much any other ‘natural’ right you have claimed. This includes the Americans in the Revolution. Their rights were alienated, which is why they revolted. It’s nice rhetoric to claim otherwise but even Jefferson understood the reality.
Feel free to go off on another digression, but you have never satisfactorily answered this fundamental question. Based on your other posts in this thread, it’s clear you won’t. But I might as well remind any looky-loos of this fact.
Not against the rules at all. But the folks who use big red letters tend not to be the ones who are entirely sane. Or rational. Or making a good point in any way. It’s not really a good sign for you.
And, they are cute when they do not realize that they are helping the opponent’s position more than theirs. For Jefferson and other Deistic founding fathers, their god was better than the god of the bible. As science and reason would be respected by that god.
So where does that leave those of us who don’t believe in Jesus? To me, the OP’s religious theory is just as weird and baseless as his legal theory, and both carry no legal weight whatsoever. And that’s a very good thing. Your Constitutional rights aren’t based on your acceptance of the Bible.
Oh, and to reinforce this, search for “Time Cube”. That page gives the best example for why text size changes, colored fonts, and weird formatting is not the best way to make your point and the fastest way to convince people you are not entirely of sound mind.