Can you explain what you mean by “trans-positive”?
I’m guessing you can’t relate to why parents would raise their children like that. Which makes sense, because I can’t at all either. It’s pretty far from a standard worldview.
But I can think of a dozen reasons why they might decide to do that before I get to “they just want attention.” Why do you jump to the least charitable explanation, when there are many others that are more likely?
When you cast such aspersions on the motivations of parents of transgender kids, it reflects on all of them, despite the “vast majority” qualifier. If you’re going to do it, at least have some evidence.
I’m just throwing out a guess here, but I *think *it means they are positive towards trans issues.
Did you actually read the cite you provided? Because its actual point is that those numbers you cited are probably incorrect.
Some of the studies basically included anyone who’s parents brought them in because they expressed interest in wearing a dress, and even the study on the lower end of the scale (the 64%) included anyone who stopped coming to their clinic as “growing out of it”.
You asked for who might be concerned who wasn’t already opposed to the idea of transgender children, and I gave you some examples. :shrugs:
Puberty blockers haven’t been used for long enough to know the long-term effects. Using them to treat transgender children is considered an off-label use, and not approved as such by the FDA.To be fair, we also don’t know the long-term effects if they are used on the large majority of children who change their mind about being transgender. So it is hard to know which approach would be erring on the side of caution.
Regards,
Shodan
For the sake of argument let’s assume that you are right and 66% of kids “grow out of it”. Then the question is whether going through puberty as a gender you don’t conform to is more than three times as bad as the side effects of the medications (which as others have pointed out, are actually known). I would suspect that it is.