Trolls R Us Resurrections

To this point, I would like to note that people use this Board for differing reasons, some of which really have nothing to do with convincing the person we are talking to. For example, I wrote a number of posts to Gandrews/MSC (wordy posts, for which I was properly chided for ‘wall of texting’) regarding a single paragraph of his.

Did I do this with the expectation of changing minds?

:joy:

No. I wrote those posts for the following reasons:

  1. I write them for myself. I enjoy doing it. The issue is important to me.
  2. I wrote them for the SDMB readers beyond Gandrews.
  3. I wrote them for the random person who might find themselves here on a Saturday morning, doing some web crawl on the question “did white people invent everything”?
  4. I wrote them because the post, ranty as it was, was a pretty good statement of current Right thinking and I wanted to address a section of it.
  5. I wrote them because I’m writing a Substack article which touches on this and I wanted to work through some ideas.

Some come here to convince. I come here to write. Two different motives resulting in differing preferred outcomes.

Many of us can’t resist nitpicking, I am one of them. It is Abbie Hoffman.

I’m saying that I often appreciate when posters like you, Temporary_Name (and a handful of others), make the effort regardless of motive. It’s the lord’s work you’re doing. :wink:

Max will be a Democrat in a couple of years.

Thank you for your service. I considered looking it up, and probably would have, we’re I on my laptop. Posting on my phone made me prefer to save myself the effort.

Again, my sincere thanks. :slightly_smiling_face:

I didn’t intend to. If it came off that way, I apologize for my clumsy attempt at communication.

The No True Conservative defence.

When did the definition of “wall of text” change? I can remember in recent years it meant a long post with one paragraph which is unarguably difficult to read and could have been easily corrected by the writer.

Now it means anything longer than the reader’s attention span as if that were the writer’s fault and not the reader’s.

tl;dr your wall 'o text there.

Next time, try being more succinct.

:wink:

ur dum :wink:

I wouldn’t exactly call with a defense (or a defence), but it is a fact that true conservatives are exceptionally thin on the ground.

I started to make this joke but thought better of it. Thanks for stepping into the breach.

Nowadays, a wall of text requires more than three swipes on your phone. Didn’t you get the memo? :wink:

No later than Twitter. If you couldn’t say it in 120 characters, no one would see the rest I bet.

No, the memo was too long and I didn’t read it.

It’s like Goldilocks. One bowl of porridge is too hot, another is too cold.

That’s fair…

If JohnT of all people thinks I’m too invested in the SDMB… ! I almost replied to you at 2am, then realized… :man_facepalming:

~Max

The irony is not lost on me, and I particularly appreciate this paragraph

I do not consider it a waste of time to articulate my views, to try to explain my thoughts and feelings and reactions. It allows me to examine my own beliefs, consider the beliefs of others, and perhaps arrive at a synthesis addressing all of the views on a topic. Sometimes I become more committed to a certain view, sometimes I realize that I had made unfounded suppositions and try to correct errors, and sometimes I realize that I had not thought the whole matter through completely. I have been known to alter my views based solely upon stating them out loud.

which totally counters my criticisms of you, despite the fact that this particular poster turned out to be a troll. I feel stupid for not having thought of it first.

~Max

It’s a good thing ‘touché’ contains the word ‘ouch’, lest I repeat myself.

It’s touché, you twat.

It’s now spelled twät, ain’t ya keeping up with the new slang? :wink: