I don’t think this guy had any connections with any terrorist group.
Thank you for the clarification, then.
Once again, to respond to the lunatics on cable news, I don’t think this guy had any connections with any terrorist group.
Ramira Ramira is offline
Member
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,145
I refer to this in those comments
Quote:
Originally Posted by GusNSpot View Post
This attitude is the problem because it is still, “We’ll fight as long as no innocent gets hurt. If innocents get hurt we will send in our citizens with no bullets for their weapons and let politicians determine the rules of conduct, you know, how tight to put on their handcuff because we don’t care if they die.”…
We are so doomed.
I am not refering to all Americans but this type of comment
My comments were/are not directed at you but:
What is your solution?
Fighting this fight the way the world is doing now is so obviously not working. More innocents dieing than bad guys. So your suggestion is to ???
XT
July 17, 2016, 3:48am
105
What do you base that on? The French seem to be saying it was a terrorist attack and the guy was ‘radicalized very quickly’. ISIS is calling the guy a ‘soldier’, which is ISIS-speak for ‘some guy randomly killed a bunch of people and told us he was on our side at some point’. What do you base your assertion on…and why, if the French themselves are saying the guy was a terrorists, are the ‘lunatics on cable news’, well, lunatics for saying presumably the same thing?
XT:
What do you base that on? The French seem to be saying it was a terrorist attack and the guy was ‘radicalized very quickly’. ISIS is calling the guy a ‘soldier’, which is ISIS-speak for ‘some guy randomly killed a bunch of people and told us he was on our side at some point’. What do you base your assertion on…and why, if the French themselves are saying the guy was a terrorists, are the ‘lunatics on cable news’, well, lunatics for saying presumably the same thing?
Every time a Muslim kills others people claim that he or she wasn’t “really” associated with ISIS but that they’re just crazy.
XT:
What do you base that on? The French seem to be saying it was a terrorist attack and the guy was ‘radicalized very quickly’. ISIS is calling the guy a ‘soldier’, which is ISIS-speak for ‘some guy randomly killed a bunch of people and told us he was on our side at some point’. What do you base your assertion on…and why, if the French themselves are saying the guy was a terrorists, are the ‘lunatics on cable news’, well, lunatics for saying presumably the same thing?
Nice attack: Ties to ISIS not yet established, official says.
XT
July 19, 2016, 1:04am
108
Right. So…why are the guys on your cable ‘lunatics’?
Ratings. Sensationalism. Lead up to “Sweeps Week”.