He won’t. The consequences, even short term, for the keystone Intel relationship are not worth any cheap jibe. It seems he understands that now. This is not something you ever fuck with.
You mean the shadow government is not allowing him his first amendment rights? Man that Obama is a real rat. Sick.
He kind of mentioned it in the press conference he just had alongside Angela Merkel.
https://twitter.com/moneyries/status/842809198597541888/video/1
Merkel’s look at him is priceless.
I need to listen to that whole press conference again. I could have sworn he over-talked Angela Merkel with a “Wrong…!”.
He doesn’t seem to have gotten the message.
This may be the very first time in Trump’s life that he’s facing actual consequences for his bullshitting.
When he said Obama wasn’t born in the USA, for example, Trump certainly faced criticism and denials—but there was nothing and no one who could make him stop saying it.
Now, apparently, Jared and Ivanka and Bannon have gotten through to him that he DOES have to stop continuing to repeat this particular bullshit story (that the UK helped Obama surveil him). There would never have been any acknowledgements of apologies to the UK having been made, otherwise. They were forced to admit this–they never would have done so voluntarily.
This is absolutely a new experience for Trump: In his entire life he has never before been asked to control himself.
The emotional pressure this is going to create inside his tiny brain will be monumental. Something is going to happen. And it won’t be good.
Merkel almost humiliated him with that look after his planned line about ‘something in common’ - it felt like a line left over from before the apology. People in that room were openly laughing at him, at the President of the United States.
FFS, does anyone in the White House have a basic grasp of diplomacy?
People in that White House were appointed for their ability to flatter and fawn on one person. “Diplomacy” is a skill far beyond the simple ‘you’re the greatest man who ever lived!’ toadyism that’s all these people can manage.

Merkel almost humiliated him with that look after his planned line about ‘something in common’ - it felt like a line left over from before the apology. People in that room were openly laughing at him, at the President of the United States.
FFS, does anyone in the White House have a basic grasp of diplomacy?
Diplomacy? From these fools who want to severely defund the State Department?

Merkel almost humiliated him with that look after his planned line about ‘something in common’ - it felt like a line left over from before the apology. People in that room were openly laughing at him, at the President of the United States.
FFS, does anyone in the White House have a basic grasp of diplomacy?
I’ve never, ever, seen a better WTF reaction by a politician, and this from our own Angela, the master of constraint and arbitrariness.
So, this whole thing has taken a(nother) turn to the surreal…from CNN:
White House: No apology to British government over spying claims
Washington (CNN)White House press secretary Sean Spicer flatly denied Friday that the White House apologized to the British government after citing an uncorroborated Fox News report to allege that a UK intelligence agency spied on President Donald Trump at the behest of former President Barack Obama.
Earlier in the day, however, a senior administration official told CNN that Spicer and national security adviser H.R. McMaster offered what amounted to an apology to the British government for Spicer’s comments on Thursday, when he cited a Fox News report that said British intelligence helped wiretap Trump Tower during the 2016 campaign.“I don’t think we regret anything,” Spicer told reporters at a gaggle Friday afternoon. Asked by CNN’s Jim Acosta if there was an apology by the administration to the British government over the matter, Spicer replied, “No, we were just passing on news reports.”
Earlier Friday, a White House official told CNN that McMaster spoke with his British counterpart on Thursday about Spicer’s comment.
The official described the conversation as “cordial” where McMaster described Spicer’s comment as “unintentional.”
McMaster also told his counterpart that “their concerns were understood and heard and it would be relayed to the White House.”
And check this one out:
Reporting or commentary? Napolitano claim shows Fox’s blurry line
An uncorroborated segment on “Fox & Friends” has sparked an international incident.
At issue: Whether Judge Andrew Napolitano’s anonymous sources were right about former President Obama using the British to spy on President Trump.
Amid widespread disbelief and utter denials of the explosive charge, Napolitano “stands by his report,” Fox News said Friday. But one of the network’s top news anchors, Shep Smith, said “Fox News cannot confirm Judge Napolitano’s commentary.”
So was it a “report” or was it commentary? There’s a big difference between news and commentary about the news. Fox’s blurry lines are partly to blame for the current controversy.
On at least three occasions, Napolitano cited Fox News “sources,” giving his claim the imprimatur of the network as a whole.
It’s unclear if Fox’s news division vetted his sources ahead of time.
A network spokesperson said the Napolitano issue will be addressed in more detail on the air on Friday evening.
But he raised the stakes by saying “if Barack Obama used a foreign intelligence agency to spy on an American who happen to be a candidate for president and then president-elect, we have a very, very, very serious criminal issue on our hands.”
Seven hours later, his story shifted a bit. On Fox’s 7 p.m. newscast “The First 100 Days,” he said “sources have told Fox that if then-Mr. Donald Trump” was surveilled, “it was done by a foreign intelligence entity,” specifically the British.
He reiterated to news anchor Martha MacCallum: “This is what sources in the intelligence community have told Fox.”
Eleven hours later, his story evolved further. Napolitano didn’t say this was someone’s “belief” and he didn’t couch it with the word “if.”
Speaking on “Fox & Friends,” Napolitano said “three intelligence sources have informed Fox News that President Obama went outside the chain of command, he didn’t use the NSA, he didn’t use the CIA, he didn’t use the FBI and he didn’t use the Department of Justice, he used GCHQ. What the heck is GCHQ? That’s the initials for the British spying agency.”
Napolitano also shared the information on Fox’s smaller sister channel Fox Business. On Thursday, White House press secretary Sean Spicer read aloud Napolitano’s appearance on “Fox & Friends” to back up the president.
Trump added, “You shouldn’t be talking to me, you should be talking to Fox. Ok?”
That’s when Fox said Napolitano “stands by his report.”
The judge made the remarks on Fox opinion shows as well as a Fox newscast. He consistently backed up his assertions by saying the information was coming from Fox News sources.
But Smith, speaking on Friday, contradicted that. “Fox News knows of no evidence of any kind that the now-President of the United States was surveilled at any time in any way. Full stop,” Smith said.
It’s like a monkey fucking a football! :eek: This situation is just unreal and gets weirder as the days go by. I think Trump et al have dug a pit so deep that they are in danger of hitting the planetary core soon…
I still can’t figure out what, in the fevered imaginations of Trump fans, is supposed to have been the point of Obama doing this. Their fantasy apparently involves Obama being SO frantic to hear what Trump is saying that he’d have some sort of massively awkward conversation with the UK intelligence service…“please, guys, I can’t ask our FBI or NSA to do this…ya gotta help me…I just GOTTA hear what Trump is saying…”
???

I still can’t figure out what, in the fevered imaginations of Trump fans, is supposed to have been the point of Obama doing this. Their fantasy apparently involves Obama being SO frantic to hear what Trump is saying that he’d have some sort of massively awkward conversation with the UK intelligence service…“please, guys, I can’t ask our FBI or NSA to do this…ya gotta help me…I just GOTTA hear what Trump is saying…”
If they can somehow delude themselves into thinking that the Democrats used illegal surveillance and conspired with another country to affect the election it will give them the psychological rationalization they need in order not to admit they were wrong about Trump.

What are the chances Trump will repeat this lie?
No chance at all. It’s a certainty.

Merkel almost humiliated him with that look after his planned line about ‘something in common’ - it felt like a line left over from before the apology. People in that room were openly laughing at him, at the President of the United States.
FFS, does anyone in the White House have a basic grasp of diplomacy?
They seem to be allergic to the “D” section of the dictionary:
[ul][li]diplomacy[/li][li]democracy[/li][li]decency[/ul][/li]
Which is odd since their leader is a dumbass.

He kind of mentioned it in the press conference he just had alongside Angela Merkel.
Merkel’s look at him is priceless.
Clowns worldwide gasped in awe at their new Clown Overlord!

Clowns worldwide gasped in awe at their new Clown Overlord!
I, for one, DO NOT Welcome our new Clown Overlard.

He kind of mentioned it in the press conference he just had alongside Angela Merkel.
Merkel’s look at him is priceless.
I love the way she handled that, as well as when she was rejected a handshake twice later. A short WTF moment, than imminent restraint with a smidgen of a smirk. She knows what field they’re playing, but Trump doesn’t even know the sport.

{…} Their fantasy apparently involves Obama being SO frantic to hear what Trump is saying that he’d have some sort of massively awkward conversation with the UK intelligence service…“please, guys, I can’t ask our FBI or NSA to do this…ya gotta help me…I just GOTTA hear what Trump is saying…” {…}
Which, of course, could be much more easily done by simply opening Trump’s Twitter feed.
CMC fnord!