Before we progress, please tell me more about how claim that you are totally ignorant of the basic facts about Gaza. Or at least were until a few hours ago. How would you say that matters? You seemed to be quite insistent that it was very important to discuss and showed something about my argument. What would you say it shows about yours?
See, this is why it’s important to point out factual errors like claims that Israel certified that it “was not an occupying power”. WP is legal. This is another example where the facts are taking second place to the rhetoric. While it may not have been savory that Israel used WP, it was hardly “illegal” to do so.
… what?
No discussion has to be extended. You claimed, in error, that Israel said it was not an occupying power. It doesn’t matter if Israel says it occupies the West Bank or Outer Mongolia, your claim that Israel says it is not an occupying power is false.
It would have been correct to say that Israel said it was not occupying Gaza. But you didn’t, you said Israel denied it was an occupying power. Period. Full stop.
No, I am aware that why I reject your use of such silly terminology to score rhetorical points. There’s a bit of a difference between “X% of the Gazan population evinces malnurishment in these categories. The health risks are as follows.” and “The Gazans are starving! It’s a humanitarian crisis!”
Notice how you’re shifting the language because saying that vast portions of the US are starving is absolutely laughable?
That’s the point.
Likewise, your repeated claims that I am somehow “ignoring” the issue of malnutrition is somewhat odd, as I cited and quoted it before you did.
The WHO has already been cited, showing that your claims are false.
You’re using UNICEF when they say that there were, “slightly higher” levels of infectious diseases.
But when the WHO says that it was not an epidemic and did not constitute an outbreak and was totally in accord with expected seasonal variations, you continue to rely on UNICEF only.
Wrong. We’ve already covered this, in depth. I cited it to you, I quoted it to you, you said you hadn’t ever seen it and didn’t address the numerous caveats.