Here is the relevant link for those of you who missed this little gem.
Right off the bat, I have to repost this because it’s just too good:
You actually claim in that statement to know, or at the very least have some resolute understanding of how human minds work. That is just batshit crazy arrogance and idiocy. We know preciously little about the cognitive mechanisms of the human brain, we probally know more about the nature of the universe. Plus the mind is a lot trickier to study than the universe. The universe is physical, we don’t know if the same can be said of the mind. You can’t sense your mind with your physical senses, the only way to sense your mind is with your mind itself. A conundrum isn’t? But not for you, you have it all figured out.
So answer me this: When you ‘hear’ your thoughts there is no physical vibration striking your ear drums, but there is electrochemical activity occurring in your brain as if you had. How’d that happen? What principle of math or physics explains how I can lift my arm just by thinking it? Where do the mind and body meet up and how? But, stop the inquiry! Philosophers close your books! Dualism is bested! TVAA has determined that the mind must be subject to the same principles that computers and the universe are. If I don’t see you with a Nobel Prize by years end I’ll assume you failed to suitably verify your theory.
Alright moving on…
I’d like to think that there is no topic too deep or esoteric to wrap my head around given sufficient time. As a matter of fact I truly enjoy the profound and fundamentally challenging ideas. Many of us in GQ and GD feel the same, which is why we devote a portion of our leisure time to self-edification and a mutually respectful battle of ideals here.
But, people like you really piss me off. I run into your type in graduate classes now and again. I don’t know whether you fundamentally lack the ability to explain yourself or abstract concepts in a clear and understandable matter, or if you actually get off on a power trip from cloaking your words in layer after layer of convolution, cryptic references, and tortuous logic. GIT requires a degree of semantic specificity and precision, but you’re just using that as an excuse to cover up your hermeneutical shortcomings. Some of the most erudite authors are capable of relaying the intensely complicated concepts to just about anyone. That’s probably why guys like Richard Feynman had such broad appeal, and you are a cocky loser with an imaginary team of scientists to verify your findings.
I simply don’t have the stomach to engage you in a debate on Gödel, it would be an insult to a fine thinker like him. I’d sooner discuss Islamic liberalism with Rush Limbaugh. Furthermore, it would be entirely pointless. Spiritus Mundi has shown more patience than common decorum requires in explaining the faults in your argument to you, and all he got in return was a brat who would remove his hands from his ears just long enough to sling mud at anyone near him. That’s what he gets for casting pearls before contemptible swine like you.
Not only are you a condescending jackass with no conception of your own pedagogic limitations, but you are a half-baked flake as well. We had another supercilious little shit like you, Justhink, why don’t you search for his posts and see how the board responded to his attitude.
