I just came across the term “admass” and I am curious how much and how often it’s used in contemporary UK discourse, and what it means and refers to when it’s used. I am particularly interested in how it’s applied to people and groups; I think I get the basic descriptive noun.
Yes, I have the dictionary definitions, but they are too terse and dry to give any sense of what the term “means” in use.
Interesting. I’ve never heard it before either, and “should have” by now. According to the dictionaries, it dates to the mid-1950s.
I came across it while looking up [James] Hugh Laurie’s earlier work, and found some UK humor specials built around the name and concept. Clearly, it’s more obscure than that might indicate and there’s thus no surprise it never crossed my desk.
But it’s a great fraggin’ term. Up there with blipverts.
The definition of it being relevant to a class of people likely to be influenced by mass media does make sense. However it would be considered a very patrician / patronizing / classicist thing to say these days, even if people did understand what you were on about
Its perhaps a relic of a time when class / cultural distinctions between upper / middle / working class people were a lot clearer than it is today.
The implication of “admass” people being the sort of everyman / everyday people “on the clapham omibus” or the sort of people who read tabloid papers or watch commercial television as a distinctive group, which has largely gone by the wayside in modern Britain, where everyone watches xfactor and even posh people affect to drop their h’s when talking to the windowcleaner.