Yes, it sounds fairly unlikely, but I’ve gotta ask. Yesterday at lunch, our receptionist was talking about her daughter, who had joined the Navy some time back. Supposedly the reason for the daughter joining was that she wanted to get into the submarine service. She went on to explain that since the Navy does not allow mixed-gender crews on subs, they’d designated one boat for an all-female crew.
Interesting. I have absolutely no problems with female submariners but how much training will the sailors have had if most of them have never been on active duty in a sub? Once the program gets running for a few years it won’t be a problem but I’d be worried about the first few tours.
As I understand it, the objection to women on nuclear submarines isn’t just a matter of mixed crews (which having separate all-female subs would address), but also radiation exposure. Radiation is more likely to affect a woman’s chances of having healthy children than a man’s chances, and nuclear submarine crews are probably exposed to more rems than are surface crews.
Heh, if someone hadn’t pointed out the date I probably would have fallen for it too. They played it pretty straight up to the purported quote from the CPO saying, “Now I have to spend 60 days underwater with women? You know how long they take in the bathroom.”
Not a problem (seems they are safer from radiation on the sub than staying home) unless there is some sort of accident with the reactor but then that is a whole other world of trouble.