So there are thousands of trees in a forest and they frequently fall over on their own?
These rock formation formed over millions of years and are in a stable balance that have stood up to winds and storms. Putting it back in that exact position would not be very possible in my opinion, albeit one a bit more humble than Magiver’s.
New trees grow on a time scale that is a blink of an eye compared to these formation. They are what we call a renewable resource. Sixty years there will be a new full grown tree. 60 years to a rock formation?
Much bigger deal than cutting a tree. Even sequoias, protected by an Act of Congress, are transient flashes in time compared to these rock formations.
Since we are now past guilt of a crime and into the sentencing phase …
No, I do not believe they were actually thinking they were doing a good thing. Don’t buy it. It was vandalism. They did the crime, they do the time. On the scale of Park vandalism this is pretty high up there both in impact and in public awareness and possible impact on others if they get off too easy. 6 months and maximum fine allowed by law.
It couldn’t be more true. It’s not even arguable that a rock that size can easily be lifted a few feet. Why don’t you argue that the Pyramids couldn’t be built while you’re at it.
I’m not saying you can’t pick up the capstone and put it back on the pedestal. I’m saying that even if you do that, you have a fundamentally different formation than what was there before Jackass knocked it over. Hence, not “reversible.”
And the soft stone pedestal that it sat on was almost certainly damaged by the rocking and the fall of the rock. It would need to be repaired with concrete/glues/pins whatever. It can never be put back in its original natural state. Natural being the key word.
You keep saying this. Is there any evidence that this knocked over goblin is easily reachable by truck/heavy machinery? Or are you volunteering to hike in your rig? Is there any place around the toppled rock to even set up such a rig?
The point you keep missing is that the rock was delicately balanced by forces of nature for millions of years. That delicate balance is what cannot, ever, be reproduced by a guy with a truck and a sling. May as well say you can crush the rock to sand, haul it to Hollywood, add some cement and water, put it in a mold, let it set then put it on a concrete block in the middle of a mall and “Bob’s your Uncle” it’s exactly the same as it was out in the wild.
Just don’t see why there is much discussion on the issue.
1 - There are laws that say “Don’t destroy stuff in the park.”
2 - If you do destroy stuff in the park there are proscribed punishments.
3 - The people in question destroyed stuff in the park against the law.
Therefore
4 - Apply punishment.
Arguments about the relative worthiness of the objects and whatnot are immateriel. If you own something then you have the right (with few exceptions) to destroy it at your leisure. If you don’t own it then you don’t have that right.
For being so dense as to not comprehend that simple idea I have a tendency to desire greater punishment for the perpetrators. This isn’t youthful ignorance, it’s deep seeded mature stupid that needs to be smacked down extra hard.
Why are you even bothering engaging with him? This is someone who spouts off bullshit such as
[QUOTE=Magiver;16781341 I highlighted it because I walked it and knew it was hacked out of a mountain. It’s relevant to the discussion and you don’t get to hand wave it away because it was done in 1926.[/QUOTE]
Seriously? :dubious: There have been absolutely no changes in value judgements in the last 87 years? Someone or some people did not do what they would do now, almost a hundred years ago, and that is “hand waving?”
Someone who sticks their finger in their ears to not hear anyone is not having a discussion. As my attorney friend likes to say, at this point, it’s simply a lot of shouting over the back fence at the people next door.
And you seem to miss that it’s a rock sitting on a pile of dirt. It was demonstrably unstable and like all the other rocks around it would have fallen. Picking it up and dropping it back where it was originally does not take away any of the scenic grandeur.
I’m simply not buying the “every stone is sacred” rhetoric from a park system that routinely makes" improvements" so that visitors have access to it.
It’s just a rock sitting on a pile of earth. All the great books in the world are only a pile of letters. The twin towers were just a pile of concrete and a bunch of steel. The pyramids are only slabs of stones aligned together. The rain forest is just a bunch of trees in a forest.
It’s just a rock sitting on a pile of earth. All the great books in the world are only a pile of letters. The twin towers were just a pile of concrete and a bunch of steel. The pyramids are only slabs of stones aligned together. The rain forest is just a bunch of trees in a forest.