I agree completely. Whether or not the scout leader’s claim that the rock was not safe is irrelevant. The fact is that is was not their place to move it. If they truly thought it was unsafe they should have notified the proper authorities and then let them deal with it.
My opinion is that they were being rowdy, reckless and boneheaded.
Five grand plus restitution to the state of Utah sounds good to me, will be the most expensive high-five these knuckleheads ever had. That said, not sure there’s too much point in jail time - to me taxpayer money there should be for keeping violent offenders off the streets and they don’t seem to be a public danger (to anyone but themselves). You might have a different take on that, though.
You really think they should be convicted felons . . . and for the rest of their lives suffer the consequences? The same implications that would have followed a conviction of sexual assault or murder? Seriously, for a non-violent act? For a few minutes of bad judgment more along the lines of a prank than a crime?
Have a heart. Fine them, humiliate them (well, that’s been done already). But don’t make them felons.
A less serious but perhaps more embarrassing punishment might be to put up interpretive signs around the park–with big pictures of their faces and a caption that reads “Don’t Be Like These Assholes!”
Well, clearly it depends on whether you think there’s been a felony committed. If there has, they should be treated as felons by definition. If not, you follow their rather shaky logic…and establish a rather poor precedent. People make mistakes all the time and pay for them, moment of madness or not.
Following the train of though of these reprobates, what’s to stop them performing whatever test they did to determine a goblin should be toppled (despite being totally unqualified to judge the danger) and going around booting down every goblin they felt like? Or, as DSeid said upthread, heading to a Redwood forest with a chainsaw with the excuse that they might fall down anyway?
ETA; unless you mean a misdemeanour charge, but that seems rather light for destroying something that can’t be replaced.
There is a huge difference between being a felon and being a convicted sexual predator. There are degrees of felonies and many of the lower degrees can be removed from your record (espunged) in many states.
If they have clean records, they will likely be able to get the charge reduced, and suffer lesser penalties. This would be the first blot on their records, and a severe warning to them not to commit any future crimes. You only get off lightly once.
The stigma does follow them, and should. It’s not quite the same as someone on the sex-offender register, and not quite the same as murder. It’s comparable to “good kids” who broke windows or set fire to a storage shed or cut down a tree.
It’s a big enough crime not to be just waved off.
They’ll still be able to get jobs in the future; they will just have to admit to having a criminal record during the job application process. This isn’t a Mark of Cain.
Seems like a disproportionate punishment to me for what was essentially a stupid, immature prank where no violence or risk to another individual was involved. The “blot” as you so cavalierly call it has BIG consequences, potentially forever.
And their actions have consequences, forever: that rock will never again sit the way it was. No one will ever again see that goblin perched as it had been for hundreds or thousands of years. I’d call that a BIG consequence, one that is definitely forever. So I think their punishment wouldn’t be out of line if it had far-reaching consequences, even ones that could potentially last the “forever” of the rest of their lives, if that’s what the court decides.