Constitutional and practical issues aside, would you? Now that we know Who’s who?
I’ve asked this question of many friends and co-workers (mostly blue collar), and a surprising number said that they would. Even with Gore as vp.
Things have been pretty good for the average worker around here for the last eight years, I guess, is the reason.
I think I would, to tell the truth.
Barring that, I’m voting for Nader.
How about it. Be honest. 
Would you?
Peace,
mangeorge
Constitutional issues aside, I still wouldn’t. He’s done a good job, but he’s served eight years and I think that’s enough. He hasn’t done such a good job, IMHO, that were it possible I would give him the Roosevelt-like third term.
Mind you, I don’t know who I am voting for in his place. sigh 
Under no possible circumstances would I vote for Clinton this year. With Gore, on the other hand, there *are**possible circumstances under which I’d vote for him. (None of which I expect to occur.)
Well, if you live in NY State, you can decide whether to vote for (Mrs) Clinton this year…
If it were a choice between him and W, yes, I’d vote for him again. I don’t like him, mind you, but I know he’d appoint Supreme Court justices whose views are more likely to coincide with mine, and I know it would be 4 more years of fighting with Congress, which means there is less chance for stupid and harmful laws.
Besides, W is an idiot.
I didn’t vote for him again the first time he was eligible (1996), and I certainly wouldn’t this time, either. Nor would I vote for George W. Bush.
> Besides, W is an idiot.
And Gore is a rocket scientist?
As background info, I consider myself an independent but tend to lean democratic more often than not. That said:
It would be tough for me to vote for him again, but I think it would probably be tougher for me not to.
Gore vs. McCain, now that would have been a dilemma. Not voting for W will be pretty easy for me, though. Wow, do I ever not like him.
Hasta.
Given the choice, I’d run like hell.
Okay, to really answer the question: yes. Besides embarassing me, he’s done a lot of things remarkably well. Remember inflation? Poverty? Insane people walking our city streets?
Wait a minute. I’m one of them…
You’re kidding, right??? Vote for Clinton again??? I’d rather have Monica Lewinsky as President.
I’d vote for him again in a heartbeat. Anyone is better than the morons we have running for president right now
Well, I kinda knew what to expect (in answer to my question), but I’m still a little surprised. These replies pretty much match the opinions of those people I’ve talked to.
I’ve never been a big supporter od term limits, but this sheds a new light on the subject. Makes me even more anti. Not that I’d be in favor of Clinton running again. But it makes me wonder how different the race would be if he did. Maybe Mc Cain and Bush’s roles would be reversed. 
Peace,
mangeorge
I would never vote for Clinton. Not once. But, it depends what the definition of “is” is. :rolleyes:
I would never vote for Gore, either. That guy’s policies scare me.
I would vote for Bush, even if I don’t agree with him on most of his views. I agree with his views more often than I do with Gore, and my views are pretty outta wack.
No thanks. There’s too many people out there being paid wages which they cannot possibly live on, working hours that make the same impossible. By his second term he had already turned on the poor, those in need of health care, and immigrants. I was very excited about him in '92, but now feel extremely disillusioned with him and in fact the democratic party.
I’m an aggressive advocate of voting for Nader this year. I feel that the democratic party, Clinton included, is no longer honoring democratic principles.
You know what though? We are going to MISS Bill… Look at those two guys who have a chance? We’re gonna be telling Bill that he can do whatever he wants with a cigar within a month of Gush or Bore’s first term.
It does not matter which one of us you vote for! Either way, your planet is doomed! DOOMED!
–The Simpsons Halloween Special
I would vote for Slick Willie again. I don’t admire the man, but the other choices seem worse. I agree that the Democrats ought to move to the left, but I see even more “solutions” at the expense of the poor under Algore. He’ll probably still get my vote because of the lack of choice. America deserves better.
I still chuckle when I see people acting offended by Clinton’s lies.
A politician lying?! This shan’t be tolerated!
comparitivly, yes he is.
I just hope that if Bush doesn’t win, we don’t have to take him back here int Texas.
[aside]
Taking a step back in time, if not for the 22nd amendment, it’s highly unlikely that the term “President Clinton” would have any meaning. Reagan would have certainly won a third term and possibly a fourth. If Bush had succeeded Reagan’s fourth term he’d be president right now.
[/aside]
Which may have easily have been the best thing all around.
I didn’t vote for Willy in 92 or 96. Nor would I vote for him in 2000.
Sorry, Southern, but I don’t think Reagan necessarily would have won a third term. By that time, his problems (napping, not being with it, scandals, etc.) were becoming well enough known that even his teflon skin couldn’t reflect it all (sure, not as bad as Clinton, but still bad enough). And with his Alzheimers, he certainly would not have won a fourth! (I don’t recall exactly when it was diagnosed, but I don’t think it was a full 8 years after he left office.)
No frickin way! He should have resigned when the Monica scandal broke. He could have spared the country the impeachment/special prosecutor mess and helped Gore and his party at the same time.
He should of leaned in an took one for the team.