try many sources!
Washington is shown with a little Moor, a symbol of his blue blood. He is not his coloured valet.
West Ford was Washingtons black son
John Hanson was black from swedish origins
Elisabeth I was described as dark and famous for painting her face white.
Find the contemporary descriptions of her mother Anna Boleyn: very dark, black eyes and dark hair.
Shakespeare begins his Hamlet with ; cast of the nighted colour. It’s a joke about Hamlet being the colour of the night as a true prince of denmark
Women the world over have always been vain and exaggerated what they see. I don’t know why she made the comment. Maybe she tanned too easily. Tanning has, until the past 30 years or so, been horribly out of fashion. Tan meant you had to work outside. That doesn’t discount her still being a “typical blond blue eyed Dutch girl”.
That portrait you posted from Wikipedia/media makes Charles II look eerily close in appearance to Woody Allen
http://digestao.files.wordpress.com/2008/05/woody-allen2.jpg
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Charles_II_of_England_Stuart_by_John_Riley.JPG
ZOMG! 17th century European nobility has been infected with New York Jewry!
(or, a Mr. Potato Head clone)
http://media.giantbomb.com/uploads/0/5768/698002-mrpotato_head_large.jpg
All good scientific research starts with defining the subject. Is Paula Abdul black, even after a nose job? Is Obama black? The one drop rule. Is Kobe Bryant black, his nose is pointy and his lips narrow.
Is actress Iman black or white?
Is a man described as the black boy, a tall black man and the swarthy stuart white or black?
The art of retouched was used from the beginning. 19th century nobility were still using white make up. They were struggling to become white, which takes four generations.
Jus imagine an old person wanting to look young, or less fat and an obliging photographer.
[RIGHT][/RIGHT]
http://images.google.nl/images?hl=nl&source=hp&q=louis%20xiv%20codfried&um=1&ie=UTF-8&sa=N&tab=wi
Its the 7th image, a black and white engraving.
Understanding where it came from and how white supremacy is still maintained. The only people who will be interested are the person who will benefit from a change. People who benefit from the present status quo will not lift a finger to change the status quo.
http://images.google.nl/images?hl=nl&source=hp&q=white+obama&btnG=Afbeeldingen+zoeken&gbv=2&aq=f&oq=
“white Obama”
I know its hard but my research is based on personal descriptions of Charles II Stuart named The black boy, described as a tall black man and the swarthy stuart. This has to stand for something, no? We are shown revisionist, whitened fakes or authentic propogandistic portraits. Why would whites paint themselves whites? why all these Moors in heraldry and portraits with nobles?
“Swarthy” has also been used to describe Asians who look nothing like any Negro. Anyone not chalk-white, for whatever reason, is “swarthy”.
I still don’t understand why they would want to “become” white, if being “black” was a symbol of nobility. Either it was a symbol, and others wanted to emulate them (of which we have no record), or whiteness was a symbol and others wanted to emulate them (of which we DO have record of white makeup being applied).
If you doubt how much rulers can influence fashion, I suggest you might want to read up on the codpiece. I’ve heard it theorized that they reached their prominence in the 1540’s because Henry VIII was unable to produce a male heir and, in order to assure his ‘virility’, took to wearing rather large codpieces.
They identified with images of Moors, a classical pitch black african, and married endogamous, wanting to keep the black colour and being particulary pleased when a baby popped out who looked like a moor.
This is a vaporized plane! Only in Star Trek if you ask me.
This might be OT but internet forums are awashed with persons who are payed by our governments to make sure folks do not stray from the path of truth as the government sees it.
There is no size reference there, so I have no idea if what I’m seeing is 3 inches, 3 feet or 3 miles long.
Oh, wait, that’s a person in the upper middle there? Hm. Doesn’t look like an investigative photo. Looks like what’s left AFTER the investigators get in and cart off the biggest chunks/important bits.
You know, this is called a discussion site, but I cannot see you, and I do not know your views on anything. I do not recall you aknowledging any of my sources and arguments. Its just you demanding in a high tone of voice evidence.
So I have posted you as an analogy a present controversy about who planned and executed 9/11 with all of us bearing witness but prohibited to give an opinion freely for fear of some tracking governmental computer adding our name to a list of suspects of terrorism.
People can get in trouble with putting things on paper or harboring such things.
As for your question: we should look at the declaration of human rights as blacks citizens, non-noble black Europeans but also whites asking for equal rights.
I have been reading about Champollion, who treanslated Egyptian hieroglyphes, coming from an area of France where people being prosecuted for their revolutionary actions in earlier years. France had become a monarchy again.
If you yourself did any research, you might better understand my problems in getting to the facts.
Your problem with getting to the “facts” is that you have none.
I assume you know what they looked like moving into Egypt and how they looked moving out. How many generations they stayed anyway.
Actually I do not believe the bible as Voltaire has already debunked it as a work of fiction and plagiarism.
You have posted a lot of opinions, but precious little fact. I do not accept your opinions.
Then don’t quote it as a citation, if you don’t believe it.
Try to view all my arguments in conjuction with each other. Louis XIV cousin Charles II Stuart was named the black Boy, a tall black man and the swarthy stuart. I allways hope someone with real expertise will answer questions. Do black and white look the same in death? always, under all circumstances?
Find in google louis XIV and l’encre (ink), parts of the book are shown in google.
By the way, don’t you get disgusted with constantly finding some convulated excuse about any argument a black oriented persons brings in? Do you ask yourself why you respond like this. Whats wrong with blacks as always seem to be wrong? Even regarding their own history? as are Arabs, always wrong, always the need to be bombed like some fermin. Only whites know best. You are speaking to a real person not some beast who worries about things going on in Europe today as if we are heading towards a new holocaust. And blacks and arabs are always wrong.
Well think of Chines americans who came to the US many, many generations ago and still look and sound chinese. Imagine them having military power and science, and ruling america. This is what I’m describing with my research 1500-1789, explaining racism. Perhaps by taking the chinese as an example we can bypass the fear or loathing or hatred blacks inspire in many persons.
Egmond Codfried, please do not insinuate other posters are racists because they disagree with your interpretation of history.