Was the 2005 UNESCO Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights ever ratified in the US?

Mangosteen · May 10, 2020, 3:13am

Little_Nemo · May 10, 2020, 4:18am

I just read up on it and, if I’m understanding it correctly, it wasn’t intended to be ratified by individual countries. It was intended as a policy statement by the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization.

Completion of the text of the future declaration, in the setting of two meetings of governmental experts, extensive discussion within the IBC and finally the approval of the Declaration, which was unanimously ratified by the Member States of UNESCO.

As can be observed, the Declaration was carefully prepared and sufficiently debated within UNESCO. The unanimous vote is resounding proof of this. While it was never translated into a treaty, there is no denying the binding force that it has on the internal order of the States, as we present below. The texts, as Badía Martí affirms, mean the consolidation of bioethics in international relations beyond the scientific dimension, its full incorporation in the relations between States with their implications in the economic, political and social fields, entering fully into the international arena.

Cite (I added the underlining to the relevant part.)

The United States was a member of UNESCO in 2005, when this declaration was ratified. So I assume we were among the countries which “unanimously ratified” it.

However, we withdrew from UNESCO in 2018 so I don’t know what our current status is in regards to the policy.

Schnitte · May 10, 2020, 1:37pm

Treaties get ratified (and become legally binding, akin to a contract, upon ratification and entry into force). This is a declaration, not a treaty.