“If a man/woman/liberal/conservative/black/white/christian/atheist said what I just said, you’d all be high fiving each other right now.” Basically trying to justify something stupid that he or she just said by trying to paint everyone else as a hypocrite.
“I was hoping you’d be more open-minded” or any variant of that phrase.
Usually, it means “I was hoping you’d simply believe everything I just said without question!”, and generally indicates there will be no actual debating with the person who said it, since they’ll dismiss cites and questions with another “you’re closed-minded!” post.
I have yet to see an overt version of this at the Dope, but it does remind me of how an ex-friend (now merely an acquaintance) used to preface any comment he would make in opposition to someone else’s, “Well, in my opinion, which is vastly superior to yours…”
That tone is apt to make me look for another thread a.s.a.p.
Anything that involves “think of the children” or the stupid argument, “if you have nothing to hide, then you should be perfectly fine with… (unwarranted searches/police cameras in your house/recording your phone conversations/being detained for hours).”
“See, I can easily prove you wrong (followed by long list of points that are based on faulty logic, or are flat out wrong)” - repeated endlessly and forcefully as if by doing so you are proving your point. While completely failing to comprehend that you’re only “winning” the argument by driving people away with blunt force stupidity.
I’ve got news for you. There’s basically nothing that all people who call themselves Christians agree on. That’s why there are so many sects. In particular, I probably don’t believe ‘X’ myself.
Correcting you means further derailing the thread. So it’s dead Jim.
The “la la la la I’ve got fingers in my ears because what you’re saying is just SO wrong” response. It is my contention that there’s nothing at all wrong with wearing white after labor day
Oh that’s just stupid. If everyone thought like you, there’d be people wearing white pants in January, and thank Og most people recognize your sentiment for the bullshit that it is
The purpose of pants is adornment and warmth. White pants would keep you adequately warm and adornment is a matter of taste. What’s wrong with white pants in January?
That wouldn’t work because no one would sell them during the buying season because that’s not when white pants are sold, so as soon as all you ‘white pants in January’ folks tried to buy them the few that were in stock would run out, so it would not work, so there!
Oh please, the only reason the stock of white pants is low is because most people do not, indeed, buy them to wear in January. If demand increased, supply would increase
No, if demand increased, prices would increase and soon white pants would cost more than your house
If the price of white pants became too egregious, there are always Simplicity patterns and home sewing machines
I’ve reported you, you troll! You’re just trying to draw attention. You’re just trying to make us all offended and stuff. You know this is nonsense and you should go away.
YES! I hate that debates get derailed by this kind of lunacy. You have to spend your time talking about why it’s not okay for cops to come into your apartment and sift through your underwear drawer, rather than discuss the issue. Although at times, that is the issue, which is even sadder.
I think we’ve settled on calling that “post-parsing,” as in, “post-parsing pedants.”
When two posters start going at it hammer and tongs over some stupid point that no one else cares about, and keep going after each other after other posters have started hinting that they should stfu and take it to another thread already. That usually makes me leave a thread I was previously interested in.
Freudian Slit did that just recently - Someone requested an only-slightly mutilated cattle teat and she comes in there with her “starving children” guilt trip, pretty much ruined everyone’s mood.