Iraqi air force has also been involved in strikes against ISIS.
Feel free to trivialize the significance of the actions and possible implications of this coalition if you must. In most ways, it’s way too early to tell if it will last or where it will ultimately lead. But right about now, you’ve got to be asking yourself, “If this succeeds, how will this affect the Jews?” 
It *was *keeping him in power, albeit within limits. It would have been easy to remove him at any time - even Dubya could do it - but the US policy *was *to let him alone within constraints, in the cause of stability and relative peace. If that wasn’t support, it was close enough.
Wasn’t the Iraqi no fly zone intended to keep him from bombing the Kurds?
And the people in the river deltas that GWHB had let him bomb immediately after the first war (and after promising them our protection), also in the cause of letting Saddam stabilize his control of the country (there were 2 no-fly zones).
Preventing Saddam from executing further reprisals there, instead of simply taking him out, was, as bizarrely as **Marley23 **says, part of supporting him in power.