I can’t speak for LA, but I personally just threw up a little in my mouth. :eek:
I think you’d feel right at home in Australia where the Prime Minister leads the Liberal Party and, like you, unashamedly calls himself a Liberal.
How are these things mutually exclusive? In fact, how are they related at all?
Why don’t Proudhonnists drink Lapsang Souchong?
Because proper tea is theft.
Edit: I fucking love that joke. It’s almost as good as “which three football teams have swearing in their names?”
It doesn’t matter what she does, some people will still hate her.
Sorry, couldn’t get back on til now. No, I’m not leaving the board over this, but like askeptic said, it’s disingenuous as hell. It’s more of a pet peeve of mine, has been. I doubt Lib would admit it, but you know he did it just to get a rise out of people. People just like me, I guess…
::fished in::
if6was9, I can’t understand why you and posters like you let Liberal get under your skin. I mean he is an attention whore, though I’ll admit sometimes he can be funny. But you are the one giving him the platform to draw more attention to himself. By making threads like this you are giving him more masturbation material, it is sad really.
Arsenal, Scunthorpe and Manchester Fucking United, right?
I reckon he’s the one masturbating. After all, he drew the picture. 
Perhaps you’d be willing to explain to me how the extra sentences you quoted change the context?
Apropos of nothing, if Hillary were any good a blowjobs, Monica never would’ve stood a chance.
Most men know that is completely untrue.
The thing about blowjobs is that plenty of people give good blowjobs. Very few give enough blowjobs.
Obviously, then, the many things we are not to consider part of the proper governmental role of “preservation” must now include emergency services.
Well, if she gave me all her money and blew me, it would certainly improve my opinion of her, but I guess I’m just easy like that.
Nothing disingenuous about it. Pedantic is the word you’re searching for. But who here can cast the first stone wrt that sin?
Shouldn’t this say, “Pedantic is the word for which you are searching”?
I looked both disingenuous and pedantic up. I have to do that to check myself… 
Neither are right.
My beef is that Lib’s name misrepresents his position. (Maliciously, I think. YMMV) Someone who comes on here might see his name and think he’s some sort of ally. I know you can take any name you want, and I don’t dispute that, but his not only is diametrically opposed to his true nature, but is intended to be so for his own personal fun and enjoyment. Just to the good side of trolling.
Not to mention that anyone who would be suckered into thinking he has anything whatsoever to do with Liberalism, gives said someone a false impression of Liberalism. In short, Lib’s moniker, his personna, no, his Madonna/David Bowie-like image, gives true Liberals a bad name. It’s a “look” intended to misconstrue. Him MISrepresenting himself as a spokesman for MY position offends me.
And the whole point of my rant…
BITCH! Just change your fucking name to anything else! You did it before, do it again. I don’t want you being associated with me. You fucking poser.
You’ve already been informed by others that most of the world — in fact, the overwhelming supermajority of the world — understands “liberal” as coming from the Latin liber, meaning freedom. Your political philosophy is known around the world as “authoritarianism”.
So since we cannot make a dent in your ignorance in that regard, maybe we can convince you that your own username is grammatically incorrect — even in America. It is in the subjunctive mood, and therefore should be if6WERE9 because, you see, it isn’t.
Perhaps he was before your time, or being as you are a “liberal” perhaps you rejected the dirty fucking hippies, but there was once this guitarist named Jimi Hendrix…
Well, certainly not moi – I admit to being afflicted with the disease. But having said that, what do you thinks of the follolwing post by, Lib – and mind you, lasyt I know we’re on good terms for the moment:
Methinks it earns him a place in The Pedantic Hall Of Fame. As well as his pic on the definition.
Having aid hat, I have a hard time taking any of this shit seriously. I could possible change my moniker to Bush’s Rim Licker and I doubt it would make a dent in my political leanings – other than attempting to be slick (sick) abou what they are.
Long live American faux-liberals! In the current sense pf the terminology in the US of course, it is rather in between pathetic and funny.
But hey! Not like a give a turd. Waay too busy with RL.