Bush’s Rim Licker. 
That’s the best username I’ve seen since Smartass.
So, real liberals believe that they have some sort of right to compel others to believe exactly as they do, or not describe themselves as liberal.
Wow.
I am glad I never thought I was a liberal. How tedious it must be.
Tris
Well, one does.
Personally, I don’t believe that anyone who starts out thinking that Liberal is a member of the U.S. political subset thus described will remain confused for long.
He’ll explain it all to you, if you ask him. And if you do, I’ll hunt you down.
There was some stuff he wrote about the wedding of Christianity to Free-Market capitalism that was downright frightening. I need to go re-read it to figure out why it scared me so much.
Ooookay. So you are a social libertarian, just like almost everyone else on this board, but you are FOR taxes paying for a whole bunch of things that LIberal would never think tax fundable. Then you mention that his awesome philosophies just might crumble in real life.
So tell me, would you voting for Ron Paul?
Unless he can beat Hillary’s “money and a BJ” platform, he’s dead meat as far as I am concerned.
I’m a republican, if anyone cares.
God save our gracious Queen,
Long live our noble Queen,
God save the Queen.
It’s not at all about compelling others to believe as I do. I couldn’t care less what you or Lib believes. It’s his representing himself as something I believe in, and that he only represents himself as such to piss off the other Dopers.
Just. Change. Your. Name.
You weaselly little fuck. You bailed on what seems to be your core principle before… (changing from Libertarian to Liberal). It’s a slippery slope that you’ve already conceded to… just for a cheap joke. So come up with a new joke and Change. Your. Name. It’s no big deal anymore. Your cred is gone.
Hell, change it back to Libertarian! At least that would garner some modicum of respect.
Liberal and I get along approximately as well as gasoline and a lit match, but, y’know, this is bullshit.
He has explained - as alluded to above - in great detail both at the time of his name change and as the subject has arisen since, both why he changed it and what he believes it stands for. To insist that he did it just to jerk our chains is, frankly, nonsense.
You want to make gov’t smaller, and decrease taxes, and take away welfare, and health care, and I’m the eugenicist… :rolleyes:
Bullshit! I don’t care what you scholars perceive as the traditional, historical view of what a Liberal is. Today, at least here in the states, the “Liberal” philosophy is clear. And Lib is NOT that!
I don’t care how he conned y’all mods into changing his name on some grand principle. It’s still just trolling. Like I said about myself before, I say about y’all…
::fished in::
Someone’s certainly is.
Heh! Like I have proposed that I have any… :rolleyes:
If you think Lib has any either, you belong among the ::fished in:: too.
Has there ever been any sort of non-governmental eugenics programs? Unless I’m missing your meaning, you seem to be phrasing the statement as a contradictory one when there’s no contradiction.
No… I’m saying that Lib’s core beliefs are that those that can… will. Survival of the fittest. And fuck the rest. And he calls for a gov that will do just that.
See, here’s the problem. If you said, for example, that **Liberal ** had no fish, that’s something tangible. Fish do not depend on other people. But cred, now, that relies upon what people think; what the general consensus is. And the general consensus seems to be that Liberal isn’t trolling on this and you’re a moron for claiming to speak for all liberals. So really, you can only actually say he’s lost cred with you and you alone. I’m sure he’ll be devastated.
And DAMMIT! I’m saying again, that is the (modern) (today) (not some 18th fucking century view’s) VIEW of Liberalism. Bring ALL of your citizens into the fold. Not just those that meet your standards.