Our pal, CandidGamera said he couldn’t start this week’s thread, so I’m taking up the gauntlet this week!
Decent week, IMO.
Amazing Spider-Man: JMS just gets better and better. The characterization is tremendously good, the dialogue sounds “real” and the stories are intriguing. (Except for the limp “GOTTA FINISH ARC BEFORE MOVIE COMES OUT” end to the last story.)
Big spoiler warning, not only for this issue, but for the whole storyline, but I got a question about this issue.
Ok, the two “ninjas” that attacked Peter at the graveyard. We know (from a advance cover Marvel posted) that the girl “ninja” is Gwen Stacy (or looks like her). Was the boy “ninja” supposed to be Peter (or a clone thereof?)
Astonishing X-Men-Wow. The heir to Grant Morrison for good plots, complex charaterization and good dialogue. IMO, this (along with whatever the renamed “New Mutants”) is the X-Book to read. I loved the Kitty-Emma confrontation. I like the fact that Kitty hasn’t forgiven Emma for their first confrontation. Rarely does a new writer deserve a new spin-off title. This guy does! The writer’s some guy named Joss Whedon. Anyone know who he is or what he’s done before?
Teen Titans Eh. A) I hate the fact that Gar is like…21 and went back to “Beast Boy”. Changling is such a better name. B) I hate Brother Blood. I’ve never read a story where I cared. C) Ditto, Deathstroke (except the Terra story). D) Ditto “Raven” (except for the first one and the other one when Titans Vol 3(?) came out) so this story didn’t have a lot of built-in appeal to me. But I trust Geoff Johns.
Batman Adventures-As always, consistantly the best Bat-book out there.
Robin-GREAT book. Granted, anything Willingham does is great, but this is…um…very great. Except Cassie’s haircut. It looks like she lost a fight with Electro. And funny dialogue.
Excalibur–Oh. My. God. (The following is all IMO, of course) This sucked. This sucked so much that, if the next issue is even half as bad, they’ll collapse into a black-hole of badness. Let’s run a thought experiment: On one hand, we have Grant Morrison’s X-Men was complex, challenging, his Magneto was consistant with the first 149 issues of X-Men and became (again) an interesting villian. On the other hand, we have Claremont A) with a stOOpid retcon (“The Grant Morrison Magneto wasn’t REALLY Magneto, he was an imposter good enough to fool world-class telepaths like Professor X, Emma Frost and PHOENIX! as well as people who’ve know him for decades (Toad, Cyclops)”) B) a reintroduction of a cuddly Magneto so nauseating that he should be wearing a purple dinosaur mask and singing “I luv yoo. Yew luv me!” and C) horrible dialogue (Callisto’s expository dialogue was cringe-worthy.) with a plot that would offend the intelligence of a cocker spaniel (IMO again). I was actually embarrassed for Claremont).
I wonder which one will survive the test of time. Highly un-recommended. I’m dropping the book after next issue unless it magically improves. (HA!)
Superman-Feh. He’s not that hard of a character to write. Why isn’t anyone writing. If I didn’t have a solid collection that went back to 1952(or so), I’d drop the book. Meanwhile I console myself-this too shall pass.
Witches-I dunno where he’s going, but I’m intrigued. (Also, Topaz didn’t used to be Indian and Jennifer Kale didn’t use to be a lesbian (not that there’s anything wrong with that) but since neither had much of a personality before…I don’t mind acutally.
Avengers–Isn’t Austen gone yet? (Apparently he’s being thrown off in the next issue or so). This issue in particular: Zzzzzzzzzzz[sub]zzzzz[/sub] Does anyone actually like Austen’s writing? (I know people who tolerate it but I’ve never met a Chuck Austen fan. So why’s he getting all these cherry books from DC and Marvel?). Also, the art is tragically bad. Captain America looks like he’s wearing the Porcupine’s shirt dyed red, white and blue.
Wonder Woman–Geez Rucka does a good Dr. Psycho. (and the cover is bizarre and cool) Very good book.
Conan-Shrug. It’s Busiek, so it’s great. 'Nuff said, true believer. I can’t think of a single bad book he’s written.
Flash–Geoff Johns, IMO, is the best Flash writer in the last…30 years or so. I liked Waid’s stuff, but it had some serious down periods (and the Speed Force/Allen legacy stuff got old the third (fourth?) time he did it (the atrocious “Cobalt Blue” arc). Johns has been on the book about as long as Waid was, and has yet to have a bad run.
Anyone else? Comments on my comments? Other books I didn’t list? C’mon in and participate!
Fenris