For 0 Kelvins, 0 C and 100 C, there’s a theoretical difference in weight (because the molecules are moving faster at higher temperatures, giving a relatavistic increase in mass), but it’s way way too small to measure.
At the Planck temperature, then there’s definitely more mass, but of course it wouldn’t be a baseball anymore, and I’m not sure that the concept of temperature is even very applicable.
Another point is that a colder baseball has a slightly smaller volume, and so will weigh more when placed on a scale exposed to normal atmosphere (due to displacing less air).
If you took an object initially with the mass of a baseball, and heated it up to the Planck temperature, its total mass would be somewhere in the vicinity of a decent-sized moon. The Planck scale is serious business.