My reason for voting you yesterDay was because I find it odd how all your powers seem to be duplicates of other town powers. Since then someone (you?) mentioned that it sort of balances out that fact that everyone elses powers seem to have a fail rate. That makes sense I guess. The new info I found, well, one of the things I forgot, I’ll have to try and remember what it was and see if it still applies, the other thing was when you got called out about how many times you could use one of your powers. Though, I’m willing to chalk that up to just being a mistake.
We all know what an OMGUS vote is and I’m not going to write out the definition here. BUT, you have just totally clarified something for me. Yes, your vote was basically an OMGUS vote in that CIAS voted for you and for that specific reason you voted for him. (Maybe that’s what the other piece of new info was?) But you just clarified that a bit with the metagamey thing. I’ve never played with CIAS, so if he normally writes really good, well thought out, water tight cases against other people and you feel that this case isn’t, then I understand. That was the piece of info I was missing.
It does still bug me a bit that you used this opportunity to double your vote against him. Like I said earlier, we have, what 7 players left, so if you are town, the extra vote probably won’t guarantee CIAS’s lynch if a better candidate comes a long, OTOH, if you are scum, and the other scum are also planning to vote CIAS, the extra vote will help. (I’ve only been in one game where someone had the ability to buy a vote, so I really don’t know all the ins and outs of it yet).
So you mis-wrote something and blamed it on not doing a good job reading your PM so that’s excusable, but earlier, everyone jumped on Ped for making the vote comment and not realizing that if someone moved their vote to break a tie it would create a new tie?
NAF, I’m still not sure about you, I went back and looked at CIAS’s case against you and while it’s not a terribly strong case, it doesn’t seem like anything in it is arguable or wrong, more of a gut feeling kind of thing on CIAS’s part.