We’ve had something pretty close to this discussion before:
If it’s just a philosophical disagreement – i.e. you believe Twitter or some other entity is not behaving in a way consistent with free expression (or free speech) and you encourage criticism to get it to change their ways, then we don’t have a significant disagreement here, IMO. But if you believe Twitter or other private entities (like the SDMB) should be forced by government to better adhere to your preferred philosophy of free expression, then IMO that’s a violation of private free speech rights – specifically, the rights of private entities to determine the speech they allow on their platform/property. That’s a much more significant disagreement.