That web site is awesome! I loathe Comic Sans, and it bugs the crap outta me when people write their emails in it. It’s overly cutesy in a way that dotting your "i"s with little circles is.
I have absolutelt no idea where you stand in that regard. You’re the first person I have ever heard complain about the impossibility of doing things in the future. Actually, I am not sure it is an idiom. I just suggested that you think of it as one, if the literal meaning was confounding you. Your complaint seemed to me to be the height of pedantry, when similar phrases are used all day long every day. Pretty much civilization would come to a halt if we were constrained from talking about things that may or may not happen in the future.
The literal meaning did not confound me, TYVM. I already didn’t like fetus’s tone*, so I thought I’d tweak him a bit about his phrasing.
*although his apology was well worded, so I’m letting it go.
I dot mine with little hearts. Because I loooooove you, pulykamell!!
Why should today be different from any other day?
I think occasional use of different fonts, sizes and colors can help make a point or clarify a post. But like most posters, I agree it is best to leave the default.
Jim {But, I will not stop my small font asides}
Good. I enjoy them.
Hey, where can I download a font that will dot the is and js with little hearts?
Here you go: How to Install TrueType or OpenType Fonts in Windows
From the Onion:
[ul]
[li]Résumé Font Offends Employer[/li][li]Area Client Would Like A Different Font[/li][li]Alpha-Bits Now Available In Serif Font[/li][/ul]
I refuse. But you will be happy to know that this message board shares your preference.
(try it.)
Because proportionally spaced fonts don’t require two spaces after a period, of course. If you were typing in Courier, you can do your two spaces all you want. But old habits die hard, I guess.
Thanks for the backup, Anaamika. That’s exactly how I feel–that one of the biggest reasons I belong to only this message board and don’t post to other MBs, free or not, is that there’s a higher level of maturity here which generally precludes pretty-posting in serious, non-emotional discussion. Want to use a big, fluffy font to express your best wishes for a marriage or your condolences for a Doper who’s lost a loved one, in MPSIMS? Be my guest. But if we’re having a serious discussion about sociology, I’d rather have it in a serious typeface, and that’s why I pay to play here. IMO, the only reason other fonts/colors/etc are still available is that they can be used cleverly in certain contexts, like in the “Don’t talk about sheep sex, I’m at work!” threads that pop up every once in a while. If you feel you need to spruce up your anthropological argument, though, the first thing I think is “I hope s/he’s not just trying to cover up a lack of content”.
Hey, I’ve done the same plenty of times.
Can you explain this further please? To me, proportionally spaced fonts are the ones that need double-spacing at the end of sentences the most, because they look too run-on. Courier, to me, is the font that needs double spacing the least.
And I’ll add that, in either case, double-spacing improves readibility tremendously.
Hmmm…let’s try an experiment.
Here is a sentance. Here is another. In this example, I am only single-spacing after the period. Does it look more or less readable then the one below it?
Now I’m using double-spaces after the period. Like that. Did you see it? I’ll do it again. There we go.
Hmmm…neither one os more or less readable, but the first one does seem off, but that’s just because I’m used to seeing double-spacing.
Uh-huh. Note that on web pages, you don’t have the option; browsers don’t display double spaces (in fact, I think it may even be part of the W3C standard that whitespace is collapsed.)
Makes sense to me. Let the people who learned to type on IBM Selectrics continue doing what makes them happy, but spare the rest of our eyeballs the outrage.
I absolustely disagree. An extra space in a proportional font is one of those things that unnerve me to no end. There’s rivers of white space between sentences and it just is painful to me to read. It simply doesn’t look right and breaks up the visual rhythm of a paragraph.
My favorite quote on this comes from The Elements of Typographic Style
Is there a logic to the argument, one way or another? Or is it simply a subjective taste preference? I’ve been under the impression that readibility was scientifically measurable (but I could be wrong).
Chicago Manual of Style says two spaces, for what it’s worth.
Cite, please? Here’s mine (bolding added):
I might add that one of the first things either the publisher or the copyeditor will do to the electronic file of a manuscript is strip out all multiple spaces.
Having said that, I will confess to the habit of typing two spaces after a sentence period (except when editing, of course; I seem to be able to control my tic at will).
Huh, I never realized before that you can actually post in other fonts. Neato.
Huh, I never realized before that you can actually post in other fonts. Neato.
Huh, I never realized before that you can actually post in other fonts. Neato.
Huh, I never realized before that you can actually post in other fonts. Neato.
Huh, I never realized before that you can actually post in other fonts. Neato.
Huh, I never realized before that you can actually post in other fonts. Neato.
Huh, I never realized before that you can actually post in other fonts. Neato.
Huh, I never realized before that you can actually post in other fonts. Neato.
Huh, I never realized before that you can actually post in other fonts. Neato.
Huh, I never realized before that you can actually post in other fonts. Neato.
Huh, I never realized before that you can actually post in other fonts. Neato.
Sorry, I couldn’t resist.