Perhaps it’s far enough in the future that they don’t recognize the anachronism?
I liked it a lot…the acting, the scenery, the horrors subtle and not, the various themes and subtext --what is the creator’s responsibility towards it’s creation? What happens when your creation starts to develop real sentience and free will? Questions considered in PofI, but this setting for considering these questions appeals to me more.
Agree with the comments above; I thought it was excellent. Really looking forward to where this goes.
The only sour note for me was Ed Harris’ character. I love Ed Harris, but I hope they develop him beyond violent sociopath.
Oh and I loved the scene of the guests laughing and posing for pictures in front of the outlaw-host they killed, while dozens of other hosts lie dead and dying in the street. Very chilling. Or was it, if the hosts are just machines who are only simulating distress?
Looking forward to more episodes.
The trailer that I saw contained one or two sex scenes that looked somewhat explicit. Does the sex fit in add to the show? I saw the movie a long time ago but don’t remember much.
Correct me if I’m wrong but I don’t think the orgy scene was in this first episode. But what was suggested was that the creators of this world developed various scenarios the guests could go through, including more innocuous ones (perhaps something like a cattle drive) but people gravitated towards the violent or sexual stuff.
I thought it was interesting when the British script guy and the more senior woman (I don’t remember what her role is other than something of importance) were out on the balcony discussing on how the hosts should be upgraded and how lifelike they should be. Should they be perfectly real and indistinguishable from humans, or very close but still obviously not human so it makes it easier and more fun to use them as needed. I’d guess that different visitors have different opinions, with some wanting it as close to real as possible, including the cries of distress. I’m guessing the show will go a lot more into that as it goes along, especially since none of the visitors so far have been major characters.
Also, I have tons of questions on how the park works, including the costs, how big the place is, what else the technology is used for, how do they ensure that guests don’t mistakenly kill other guests, what they do for programming so that the hosts don’t even hear the visitors talk about them being robots, and plenty of other questions. None of these are plotholes, just things I’m curious about and I’m sure that at least some of them will be answered in the episodes coming up.
Right, there was nudity but no explicit sex scenes so far, just some guys partying with girls at a cabin, or other guys taking prostitutes out of the frame. There’s obviously some innocent scenarios, since there was a couple with a kid who met Dolores. I think in the next episode we see a visitor come to the park and I’m guessing we’ll hear more about how it works and what he can do and will be told about the different scenarios. I’m imaging that the explicit sex scenes will fit in the show because it does fit thematically, but can’t be sure since they haven’t shown that yet.
I’m kind of curious what other “worlds” these people have created. Perhaps there is one where you’re a swordsman in a medieval city or another set in Ancient Rome?
isn’t that on purpose?
Fantastic pilot! Just drew me right in. There were some amazing visuals and the world they’ve created (no pun intended) is just fascinating to me. I can’t wait to see where they take this. And I’m so glad to see good big budget sci-fi on a major channel like HBO.
The movie had Medieval World and Roman World, I could see the show also having those. Or maybe even go more extreme, with a Warzone world where you can actually go kill some terrorists or something like that.
Obviously, since no one would want to visit an actual accurate Westworld, other than some history nerds who likely wouldn’t have the money to visit. But even if they’re not going for total accuracy, I was wondering if the anachronism of Black Hole Sun was something that would be obvious to the visitors or is just obvious to us. I’m guessing there will be more discussions in the staff on how accurate to make things. Like where do the visitors go to use the restroom? Do they have to use outhouses and chamber pots, or are there modern restrooms that the hosts just don’t see? Not the point of the show and I’m sure there won’t be huge amounts of time devoted to all the details like that, it just makes me curious.
I’m pretty sure they will. He’s obviously looking for something. And there is apparently lot of speculation as to whether he’s guest or host (the best theory for him being a host I’ve heard is that Ford programmed him as a super-host to aid in robot evolution; the best theory for him I’ve read in general is that he’s a former employee, maybe even an early partner of Ford’s, who is pissed at the company).
According to IMDB, in the film, Yul Brenner’s character was called The Gunslinger. In the new show, Ed Harris plays The Man in Black. I guess all things really do serve the Beam.
Yeah, I guess it depends on how far into the future the world is set. If it’s 500 years in the future, the folks in that world likely wouldn’t realize that Black Hole Sun was 200 years after the events they are portraying. If it’s supposed to be 50 years from now, it may be a purposeful anachronism to remind guests that this is a fake world (remembering the conversation held by the two employees on the top of the HQ).
I loved it, and can’t wait for the rest of the season. It looked great. It sounded great. The Ed Harris/James Marsden twist 15 minutes in totally got me. Loved the old-timey western versions of Black Hole Sun and Painted Black. I’ll have to watch it again to see if there were any other popular tunes I missed.
Early on, Jeffrey Wright’s character says something like, “There hasn’t been a glitch this bad in over 30 years.” I wonder if he’s referring to the events of the movie? I think Ed Harris said he’s been coming to the park for 30 years.
My guess is that we’ll find out Delos deactivated Roman World and Medieval World, and rebuilt a bigger, better, safer(?) Westworld.
Not sure I agree with you math there, Lou. 
~1880s to 1994 is 110 years.
I haven’t seen the show, but the original movie makes it clear that the robots are for sexin’ and killin’. The two primal instincts.
Watching the original with 21st century sensibilities makes me wonder how society should be different that it was shown in the movie. if you have robots that can simulate sex well enough that people would prefer it, that is very advanced tech. The skin, the temperature, the movement all have to be right. (I mean yes they are guys who will fuck a hole in a tree, but they aren’t paying Westworld prices!). If you can make believable sexbots, the same tech can be used to make artificial limbs and organs. And a computer sophisticated enough to pass for human responses and fit inside a robot body would revolutionize every facet of life, from self-driving cars to Star Trek-like pdas.
First of all it’s not 1994 in the show but sometime in the future. Second, someone in the show said that all disease had been cured. Westworld basically represents a release for rich, bored people who have nothing to worry about.
Can anyone tell me how this is supposed to work as a weekly series?
I mean, I saw and really liked the original movie, but eventually the larger world notices all the … dying of actual people. Do they bring in another bunch of tourists and have them killed weekly? Is there one group of tourists that are followed for multiple episodes whose numbers are thinned down by attrition? Do they have to join in some defensive coalition to stay alive?
Just wondering about the general plot development over time.
No tourists have died in the series. There were plenty of deaths, but only of the robots who can be brought back. The only permanent death was of a fly. Some robots were acting glitchy, but more like they were having a stroke or acting erratic, none of them turned on the tourists. Eventually as more problems develop with the robots there might be a tourist who dies, but it’s not like the movie where there was a huge massacre. The series has taken the idea of the theme park and greatly expanded on it and the ideas inherent in it, it’s not just a killer robot after the rich visitors.
Black Hole Sun, etc., hard as it is to believe, is firmly “classic rock” now. Literally the same temporal distance (~20ish years) from teenagers today as the classic Led Zep and Pink Floyd albums were when I was a teenager. Even though their technology looks like magic, so would our current tech to people 40 years ago. I would say there’s no reason to believe this needs to be 500 years in the future. Probably more like 50. Could even be 30 or 40. The middle-aged rich folks visiting that park would be teenagers now; a lot of them would certainly have some recognition of the classic rock tunes on the piano. It would probably at least sound somewhat familiar even to those who couldn’t name the tune.
I liked it, but some of the dialog seemed a bit clunky and too obvious, either explanations of things that were just a little too clear and deliberate to feel like a real conversation between two people familiar with the tech already, or attempts at “foreshadowing” like “you don’t have kids, do you? Then you would know they always rebel” that rather than flow by as a natural part of the dialog that plants a seed about future danger, instead just hung in the air and fell flat on the pavement with a dull thud. Yeah, we know, it’s a show about a robot theme park. Anyone who’s ever read anything, watched anything, or visited Itchy & Scratchy Land knows rebellion’s part of the deal.
Anyway, I usually chalk up clunky exposition aimed at idiots to being just something that commonly afflicts pilot episodes. Hopefully if the show has points to make about what it means to be human and the nature of consciousness or the soul, we don’t have to listen to the scientists converse explicitly about what it means to be human and the nature of consciousness.
Oh, and I did like that. Though the guy talking about the glitchy sherriff (?) saying “he didn’t/wouldn’t/couldn’t hurt a guest, he literally couldn’t hurt a fly” almost ruins it.