What are crystal & indigo kids?

Brats? Sounds like teenagers, more like. Wonder what they’ll call the kids when they hit 13.

Wasn’t there a quote by P.T. Barnum floating around, cited by Cecil, to the effect of “After the post-war era, there were two born every minute”?

:wink:

Nope, they’re called Indigo children because, when they act up, you take 'em up to their room, open the door, and with a curt jerk of your thumb you mutter “Indigo!”. :smiley:

I just burst out laughing at work. :slight_smile:

His name is Inigo Montoya.

He can’t see why we’re bothered.

He’s just some guy.

These are not the Indigo children you’re looking for.

these are not the indigo children we’re looking for

Actually, it may be that seeing auras is purely a personal phenomenon. From here:

The two parts of this reply are incompatible. Any ‘good’ source (a source that is well-informed and worth heeding) would tell you that so-called ‘aura reading’ is nonsensical superstitious crap which has consistently failed any empirical testing, and that to assign any significance to supposed auras is, by definition, to see significance where none exists. Any source that tells you anything different may be a source, but cannot be a good source.

Actually “auras” do exist-for us migraine sufferers, we sometimes see flashes of light, bright colored patterns-the same sort of thing you see after you stare at a bright light and then get an after image. It’s usually a sign that a bad one is going to hit.

As a specialist in gifted education, I have grave concerns about the Indigo Children movement, as I do about many aspects of the gifted brigade. Some children are different and have, as we term it in the trade ‘special needs’. Sometimes this is because of intellectual abilities. Some of the Indigo Children ideas don’t match all kids.

The traits I have read of Indigo Children match many lists of gifted children - kids who find school dull because they can work at much faster rates, or frustrating because they see links and depths that the majority don’t, or have an insight which seems way beyond their years, or an unusual obsession giving them what seems incredible knowledge. Like all kids in an ideal world, they should get the education to match their needs, just as those with sporting or musical ability often do. Gifted kids might be extremely gifted, but they are also kids. Some parents like the ‘gifted’ bit much more than the ‘kid’ bit when they put their offspring on public display.

When a label is slapped on and used to convince the child that their specialness means they don’t have to abide by social expectations, then you end up with a very unhappy misfit by secondary school. In extreme cases - and I have dealt with quite a few - I would rate the behaviour of some parents as child abuse. (And others as excellent parenting seeking the right education for their child - but that doesn’t apply to the Indigo Children approach being discussed here.)

So recognising special abilities is great - but using them as an excuse for isolating their child from the social awareness they will need, especially as teenagers, is just plain cruel.