Nobody except the police and the active, overseas-deployed military should be allowed to have guns, and I’m not sure about them.
So you’re saying you’re pro-beastiality?
I suppose at least one pro-choicer can also br counted as anti-life.
I like that - base it on the time-honoured policy of, “If you’re going to fight over it, NOBODY gets it!”
A massive computer program that hasn’t been invented yet. 
Oh and as for mine: it’s not so extreme in the sense that it’s empirical fact, but nobody wants to acknowledge it and they’ll generally go to great efforts to dance around it or discredit the evidence (especially here) - statistically, on average, men are smarter than women, and white people are smarter than black people (Asians are also smarter than white people).
Short story for you to read. Franchise. (Wiki link)
I’ve got a few…
-
I believe that banning abortion would be pretty much the same as slavery. Yes, it wouldn’t be miserable for most of us in our day-to-day lives. But functionally and (for lack of a better word) spiritually? Yeah. It’s slavery.
-
I believe that in many cases you can “just decide” to get over certain mental disorders. In conjunction with this, I believe we know a lot less than we think we do about mental disorders, and a lot of how we are treating them is doing a little bit of good along with a lot of damage.
Are you saying the practice of abortion is comparable to the practice of slavery or that banning abortion would make women slaves?
1.) Killing someone who is trying to steal or damage your property ought to be considered as legal as killing someone who is trying to take your life.
2.) Parenting permits. Anyone that gives birth illegally is sterilized, does some time in prison, and is stripped of their citizenship.
I don’t believe that homosexuality exists. I think it is a modern term used to categorize people who engage in non-specific forms of behavior. It is part of the unceasing effort of the narrow minded to place labels on all people, concentrating on seperating those who are not perceived as ‘normal’.
That morality does not really exist, and there is no such thing as a ‘right’ or ‘wrong’ act.
(I’ll temper this by saying that I believe that acts can still have extreme negative consequences, and can be well- or ill-advised, but not morally wrong or right.)
All price control-related social programs should be eliminated, instantly, and where necessary replaced with substantial income redistribution programs. That includes semi-private stuff like electricity price controls (to some extent; they have to be controlled but not kept as stupid low as they are now) all rent control, all interference in agriculture, all trade barriers.
Pretty close; you are declaring that you, not they own their bodies. And it certainly sets a legal precedent in that direction; if you can force a woman to serve as an incubator, it’s not much of a stretch to extend that into making them a sex slave.
I do agree with banning abortion under most circumstances, though I don’t think that my view on that issue is “extreme” since I do think that there are some pragmatic exceptions to be made (such as for life of the mother and rape) and I am a supporter of contraception.
Probably more controversial is my opinion that Project Prevention is doing a lot of good by giving drug addicts an incentive to get on birth control or get sterilized. I do not believe it is ethical to force people to get sterilized under any circumstances (because in my experience it is very easy for idiots to get in positions of power so I would not trust anyone to make the decision correctly about who should or shouldn’t be sterilized), but if someone WANTS to get sterilized in exchange for some cash, I support them.
Like that, yeah!
How about having different levels of citizenship, like a full voting franchise and a second level of citizenship that does not have voting rights for people who are in jail, on welfare, or have had illegal children (I like your parenting permit idea)?
Oh - and -
A person should not be considered to have consented to sex unless they say so in clear, verbal terms. Unless they have done so, it should be presumed to be nonconsensual.
- Legalize drugs: all of them.
- Legalize prostitution
- Legalize gambling
- Churches should be treated like any other business for tax purposes.
- Open loaded carry should be perfectly legal in all states/cities, long blades (over 24" too)
- Any typical small arms should be legal for sale, if one person can carry and use it…let them
- Abortion should be easily and legally obtained
- Charges secondary to harrassing/assaulting someone for trying to get an abortion should be charged as a hate crime.
- Getting a drivers licence should be much harder, and in car tests performed more frequently.
- Financial penalties for crimes/infractions should be a percentage of your gross income.
- Unions can pretty much all go away
I think it’s quite a stretch. I don’t see what gives someone the right to knowingly cause the death of (what I consider to be) another person for their own behaviour. If you don’t want a child, take measures to prevent having a child. I think this is less a case of the mother’s rights than it is of the child’s rights.
So much “yes”.
And/or assets.
That’s what I would consider a form of moderation of my parenting permit program rather than the extreme like the OP wanted. The idea of stripping them of citizenship is that it would enable us to dump said violators into some Third World hellhole.