It looks like the Republicans will take the Senate and not lose the House. What will they do with that power?
Of course a great deal of their base will demand they impeach Obama, but any sane Congresscritter knows that would be worse than pointless – they still won’t have the 2/3 majority needed to convict in the Senate, and no Dem will vote to convict, and they must remember that the Clinton impeachment only provoked an anti-Pub backlash.
Maybe I’m crazy, but i’m hoping the Congressional Republicans try to work with the President to find common ground and compromise for the good of the nation.
Yes. Because the Dems were at least working with Dubya (and the filibuster-prone GOP Senate minority) on a fair number of issues, and continued to approve the vast majority of his executive and judicial appointments.
That fact (ETA: judicial appointments), all by itself, made Dubya less of a lame duck than Obama will be of the GOP takes the Senate this fall. Does anyone see a GOP-controlled Senate approving a single one of Obama’s appointments to the Federal courts? I sure don’t.
So, you’re happy with the thought that there is not a chance in hell that they will act like adults and try to do what is best for the country in the long run and not what is best for their political careers in the short run?
Oh, yes, that’s another thing – the base will demand ACA repeal, which would be electoral poison in 2016. How are the Congressional Pubs gonna deal with that?
What kind of person openly expresses joy in the fact that his or her own country is ailing under the leadership of a president he or she didn’t happen to vote for, and is even more joyful that his or her political party may have had a deliberate hand in causing that ailment to come about? It is the equivalent of pissing in the stewpot just because you didn’t get to be the cook that night.
I would generally prefer the federal government do nothing, so that’s just fine. A congress that passes no new laws is successful as far as I’m concerned.
The first of these seems rather premature. I believe pundits generally have the Republicans as very slight favorites or too close to call.
And a lot could change IMO, e.g. if the US ups its military involvement vs ISIS, or possibly due to some Obama executive orders. Also, the ACA exchange renewals.
In fact, as a conservative, I might be less happy with the coming two years than I was with the last two.
I’d list my preferences as follows:
Reduction in size of government. Reduce existing laws and regulations. Simplify tax code.
Pass no laws of any kind.
Conservatives in power and pass laws along their ideology. This might include some of #1, but would also include lots of pork and other crap.
Liberals in power and pass laws laws along with their ideology. This is the worst scenario, because in this one our already bloated government will continue to grow at an unsustainable rate.
We’ve basically been in situation #2 for the past few years. I’d love to think we’ll be in situation #1 when the conservatives come to power, but it will probably be more like #3.
These activities require new legislation from the congress?
I would go so far as to say that any politician that campaigns their federal election effort based on promises to do nothing and stymie any effort whatsoever would get my vote. Like that’s going to happen ever.