The emphatic atheists always amuse me: they tend to have such specific ideas about the God in which they do not believe! “There is no God because if there were God there would have to be physical manifestations of him and there aren’t”. “There is no God because since the earth is round there is no heaven above us because there is no ‘above us’ to speak of”. “God doesn’t exist because the world was created in the Big Bang 15 billion years ago instead”. Admittedly, most of these vivid images of who or what God is were first rendered by believers trying to convince them, but still…
I suggest that the question “Is God real?” is a meaningless question until/unless you define “God” for the purpose of the discussion. A more meaningful question might be “Do you find the concept of God to be useful to you in explaining/understanding reality, and why?”
It might be particularly useful to establish the following:
• When we speak of God, do we consider God to be a distinct entity separate from other entities, things, forces, etc., that are real? In other words, is God, whose existence we’re discussing, a “concrete noun”? or is God a characteristic of the universe (or of an aspect of the universe) that, once understood, causes the universe to make sense to us, an abstraction?
• If God is noun: do we consider God to be a sentient entity in the sense of having thoughts and consciousness of experience which flow with the passage of time? In other words, does God mull over something on Tuesday or get mad about evil behaviors in the 20th century, or create/destroy something for specific Godly reasons next week? or is God more like a force or a way that things work?
• If God is abstraction: is God best understood as That Which Is Powerful, i.e., as being (or being of) the underlying nature of power? Or more as That Which Is Good, i.e., being (of) the underlying nature of How Things Really Ought to Be? Or more as That Which Loves, i.e., the underlying nature of whatever is in this world that takes care of us and brings us happiness?
• If you yourself use the term “God” (other than to refer to silly belief systems of others, I mean), what would someone else have to believe against in order to be a true atheist opposed to God as you conceptualize God? When someone says “I don’t believe in God”, is this any more meaningful than for them to say “I don’t believe in Ishmakabibble”? Which of the atheists’ “Gods” in which they don’t believe has so little correspondence with the God in which you do believe that their “atheism” doesn’t really conflict with your beliefs at all?
Designated Optional Signature at Bottom of Post