What color is this dress?

OK quick update, now all I see is a blue and black dress no matter what my brightness setting is on my Note 4. My brain finally understands what the colors are supposed to be, that the dress is way overexposed, and is blue and black. I feel much better now. I was really upset I was seeing white and gold when it was revealed the dress is blue and black

I’m really glad I got to see both. but now I can only see it as vivid blue and washed out black. Before it looked clearly white and gold, but I hope I never see it that way again, since that is not the color of the dress.

I’m blown away.

Absolutely. But I didn’t mention anything about left bs right brain, and my anology has nothing to do with it, to be clear.

Oh and that article that shows the three different versions, they all look blue and black to me now. Before, the left one was clearly white and gold, and left was clearly blue and black. Now all of them are clearly blue and black, though not the same shades . I’ve totally flipped

Nobody thinks you did. But the article says that, and other versions of it are more explicit in stating the falsehoods of “brainedness.”

I was closing my tabs before going to bed, and the dress had turned bright blue and black !! :eek::eek:
I’m really puzzled at how what was clearly a very light blue has randomly turned into a deep shade of blue. How can my brain change its interpretation that much???

Same here, exactly the same. I can sorta see the white as blue, but I have no idea how you get black from the gold.

Gotcha. I wasn’t sure, so I wanted to clarify. Yeah, that’s a pile of BS. When I opened it originally, it spun counter-clockwise. When I opened it later to fix the link, it was spinning clockwise for me.

It’s white and gold for me, no matter how much I squint or scroll.

Meet the man behind the blue-and-black, white-and-gold dress

Article about the company that makes the dress.
And the big news: There will be a white and gold version later this year.

black and blue.

(boldface added)

So after all it is not “obvious”. Or rather it’s only *subjectively *“obvious” for you because, as you said, to you those brownish-gold RGBs in context mean “I’m looking at something that IRL is actually black”. But the huge online experiment suggests the context itself is not universally obvious. The yellowish-gold RGB is obviously black in context to you because you (and others) know and virtually-instinctively make allowance for something that a majority of people looking at screens apparently don’t even know needs to be made allowance for. So a lot of people in fact simply do look at the RGB of the flat pixels on the screen and in fact do “see” muddy yellowish-gold and very faint bluish hazegrey, and that is all they see (for which Gold/White was their best approximation). But OTOH there are people who intuitively proceed to reconstruct the scene environment, and without apparently needing conscious effort could “see” the black and blue.

^And it’s not even just average joe not knowing what to make color allowances for in imagery. Even experienced photographers seem to get screwed up by that, assuming that it is a case of faulty white balance that makes it blue-biased. Even the popular Photoshop educator and guru Scott Kelby got the whole thing wrong on his Facebook post today, claiming that the dress was white and gold, and that it was just the camera white balancing incorrectly for blue.

Exactly. Welcome to “the club”

I originally was in the “what? How the HELL can anyone see anything other than bluish white and GOLD??” camp like some still are in this topic.

But now, no matter what photo of it I look at, it’s very clearly black and blue. Like “What? How the HELL can anyone see anything other than black and blue???”.
It’s uncanny.

Those of you still only seeing white and gold: Give it some time. It took me about 12 hours before it changed for me…but then one minute I looked at it again and it was like seeing a new dress.
My reaction: “Oh my God…is is black and blue…” in a half whisper.

So, my 6th graders got nothing done in science class today because all we could do was argue about that dress. We viewed it together projected on the screen, and as we all stood at the back of the room, the majority of all classes saw white/gold and a minority saw black/blue.

My last class tried an interesting experiment, though. They changed a setting on their iPads so that the colors were reversed/negative. The blue/black kids said they saw white/gold in negative view. The white/gold group said they continued to see white/gold, but that the stripes were reversed.

I saw white and gold both ways but didn’t pay attention to the stripes so I don’t know if they were reversed or not.

with that web page and the dress is now blue and black.

Okay. I just clicked back on the tab with that web page, and the dress was blue and black. Then I refreshed the page, and it’s white and gold again. What is going on?

I see them all as various shades of blue. Light, medium, dark. But none of them look white.

Obviously meant “obviously for me.” This is color, and a matter of qualia and perception, I thought it was a given that it was subjective. Sorry I didn’t qualify the statement.

Huh. I just tried that, and it changed from looking completely blue/black to looking steel blue/muddy gold. Still not white, but much closer.

Through this miraculous discovery, perhaps all sides will gain empathy and peace shall finally reign. (Ah, it’s the Internet - who am I kidding?)

Forgive me but your posts are cracking me up. You are clearly someone who is seeing it as “white and gold” and thinking that the argument is over whether it is “white and gold kind of in a shadow” or more like “light blue or periwinkle with tan trim” and blaming slight differences in vision or monitor quality. Sometimes it’s a mistake to be SO sure you’re right because those seeing it “correctly” (and I’m not one of them) see a deep, royal blue and jet black.