What conspiracy theories do you believe?

Did you not see post #57? The one right above yours?

Then why haven’t the Japanese, who have no oil and no major oil drilling companies, seized on all these alternative energy sources?

No. I opened the thread in a background tab before you posted. Sorry.

The Origin of AIDS.

Interesting - but the Turks aren’t Arabs either, are they? So, why would Israel lean towards the Kurds?

Okay, I’m going to take some heat for this, but I believe the Jews are controlling the government of Israel.

Thanks. I also believe that the Russian government was responsible for poisoning Yuschenko (non-fatally, fortunately), killing Anna Politkovskaya, and poisoning Alexander Litvenenko with polonium (nasty, horrible death) - but sadly, these aren’t terribly outlandish beliefs. Pretty much mainstream, unless I’m mistaken.

Yah, Putin scares me.

Israel supported the Kurds against Saddam Hussein, and supports them against Syria and against Iran (who also aren’t Arabs, of course, but are still hostile). When it comes to the Turks, it has to pull of a balancing act, and try to make nice with two parties that hate each other. That’s why it makes sense that we helped capture Ocalan - we take down one pro-Syrian Kurdish leader to appease the Turks, and get them to overlook our support of more moderate, pro-Western Kurds.

I seriously doubt this one, but it can’t be conclusively ruled out either. There is historical precedent for a government to allow an attack on it’s territory to further the greater good.

Winston Churchill and the bombing of Coventry

Whether or not 9/11 actually furthered a greater good is the topic of another debate.
The CT I subscribe to is that Bush had no evidence that Saddam had WMDs and had the data cherry-picked to validate our entry into Iraq. For the greater good.

I believe that FDR deliberately provoked the Japanese into striking before the U.S. entered WWII. I believe it was cold, calculating and was carried on over 2 years. I believe he expected a surprise attack but didn’t expect the Pearl Harbor attack to be so initially damaging…but he did expect it and was happy it happened.

I don’t know what to think any more re 9/11.

I’m on the mailing list of some guy who really doesn’t trust Bush and his guys. He’s telling anyone who will listen to stay out of the subways in New York and Washington, D.C. on the Fourth of July weekend (from Thursday the third through Sunday the sixth), because he fears there will be a bombing incident designed to frighten people into voting for the Republican nominee (like, this was planned months ago, before they knew who the nominee would be). AFAIK he has nothing to base this on but his own mistrust of Bush.

Just thought I’d share, in case you know somebody who lives in NYC or DC.

There’s also some documentary that claims that you can see on videotape of the burning WTC towers some kind of melting metal, that is meant to indicate that the towers were rigged with something to help them collapse. Part of the claim is that there is no reason why anything should be burning or melting at the corner of the building, far from where the plane hit.

I can’t think about this stuff. It upsets me too much. It’s horrible whether it’s true or not. Either it’s true and somebody’s getting away with something monstrous, or it’s not true but we can’t be sure because these guys are so untrustworthy and secretive. And either way I can’t do anything about it.

Huh - interesting, thanks.

While I don’t believe it was released intentionally, I’m not convinced the HIV virus wasn’t engineered as a possible bioweapon which somehow got out there accidentally,* a la * The Stand, and the circumstances covered up as much as possible.

Is the idea that Bush & Co. knew there were no WMDs but lied to invade still a CT? If so, I believe that one.

Other than that, the only one that I am not sure about is the Ohio elections in 2004. No real proof, but there are a lot of questionable things that happened then, which make me go :dubious:.

Do you have any evidence that it might have been a bioweapon that somehow got out there by mistake? If not, you can be convinced otherwise.

I wasn’t trying to be rude. I really did think I was being whooshed.

:slight_smile:

I will never believe that Reagan and Bush I weren’t fully aware of, and participated in, both the Iran/Contra scandal, as well as the delay in Iran releasing our hostages until moments after Reagan’s inauguration.

Another; I suspect that the mysterious anthrax letter attacks were attempts by the Republicans to kill off Democratic Congressmen for political advantage. And to spread fear of terrorism at the same time.

Cecil Adams is a fictional character.

Would HIV really make an effective bioweapon though? The time it takes for advancement into AIDS and the difficulty of effectively spreading it seems like it would be impractical, unless you either infected a tiny polygamous third world country or were counting on it being a damn long war where it had chances to spread.

(No, I’m not debating, I’m actually wondering if HIV could make an effective bioweapon as it stands my knowledge of HIV pretty much extends to “it’s bad” and “things to avoid doing if you don’t want it” and maybe a couple general effects).

My conspiracy theory that I know is 100% true:
90% of all conspiracy theories are made by aliens, 20% of that 90 are made up by alien ghosts. It’s a fact!