For self-referential completeness:
In California a semi-automatic rifle with a detachable (without a tool) magazine and a pistol grip is an assault weapon. This defines an AR15 and is patently absurd as the ubiquitous Ruger Mini 14, for example, is chambered for the same round (.223), comes with a detachable magazine and is capable of the same rate of fire. The only difference is that the AR15 has a pistol grip.
Other states use similar definitions. Theaforementioned “without a tool” loophole will probably be closed.
I’ll throw one thing that’s been bothering me out here-- bayonet lugs should not be a criterion, in spite of the fact that they really have no good hunting or home defense use. My reasoning is this: no one is getting killed by bayonets in this country. Ergo, I don’t think that we ought to regulate bayonet lugs. They’re not a problem.
The definition is 100% poilitical and subjective. Just perfect for politicos.
NM
As defined by the Assault Weapons Ban of 1994, here is what constitutes an “assault weapon”:
Keep in mind that these definitions were created with the express intention of banning weapons with these characteristics. There is nothing inherently more dangerous about these weapons in, say, 5.56 NATO/.223 Remington, than in any other weapon of that caliber. A weapon with a flash hider but lacking any other feature on the ban list is not an assault weapon, but add a bayonet lug and it is.
There are people that want to argue that the definition is fluid, and in the sense that they can add to the ban list it is, but this is the only definition codified into Federal law at any point and as such this is the answer.