What Effect Will Trump's Concentration Camps have on his reelection campaign?

I’d be interested if you had any hard numbers and / or cites about this. Do you know what % of those being detained are asylum-seekers that did not cross into the country without authorization?

Since you brought it up, I became curious and checked.

BTW, I didn’t find her arguments as compelling as you apparently did.

[And at least one that we know of is in fact a US citizen](Peter Sean Brown).

Side note - hey Bone, which bothers you more: the treatment of people in the camps, or whether or not the thing historians are calling it reminds you of the holocaust? And which have you posted more about?

(And, for shits and giggles, let’s make it a 3-way with that “joke” about the wrong flavor of toothpaste.)

It appears that some camps are holding people and children in sub-human conditions. Since a significant number of Trump’s supporters consider immigrants to be sub-human, aren’t they getting what they deserve?

That lawyer arguing in court last week wasn’t arguing about a lack of funding, she was arguing about a lack of necessity.

The important thing to remember is that there are wrong people on both sides here.

But really, calling these things “concentration camps” hurts the feelings of a lot more people, so let’s get some perspective here, and call that out more. AmIright?

You think McConnell and Shelby just violated the Constitution?

That doesn’t strike me as partisan. Being non-partisan doesn’t mean “not having positions on things.” Those positions seem entirely consistent with advocacy for the well-being of children.

As I look through their positions, they oppose marijuana legalization and most state laws that provide for medics marijuana outside of FDA regulation. That most certainly isn’t liberal orthodoxy.

I see no contradiction with someone holding conservative principles and endorsing the positions they have taken.

XT, I also disagree with your article, but not because ‘conservativism’. It claims they are not concentration camps because the goal is not the elimination of the target population. But- that is the goal. As everyone is pointing out, conditions are bad as a deterrent, to dissuade people from coming. People can leave, sure, if they deport to where they came from. Elimination. And, in conjunction with the deportation scheme of millions that is supposed to start any time now- elimination.

No, they aren’t being gassed. But they are being got rid of. So there. I agree there is a political wrestling match going on as well, and that using the term does tend to draw in the severe historical connotations. But what is more severe- an uncomfortable truth, or toddlers without diapers pissing themselves in detention wondering where the fuck their parents are?

Advocating for keeping child prisoners in humane conditions is clearly a partisan, liberal position.

The treatment of the people in the camps. I think this is the first I’ve posted about either topic, so tie? I didn’t interpret the toothpaste comment as a joke. It was a statement that essentially said, criticize the substantive issues and drop inflammatory rhetoric.

Ya buddy. That inflammatory rhetoric hurts people’s feelings you know.

It’s actually about the same as holding children in isolation in horrible unsanitary condition.

I would say holding people in isolation in horrible unsanitary conditions is way worse, but if you feel that way I guess that’s between you and your conscience. Cool story, bro.

Yep, you got me. That was my exact point. Cool.

Could you connect the dots on that for me? I don’t recall seeing anyone complain about as trivial an issue as getting the wrong flavor of toothpaste so it seems like a bit of a non sequitur.

In case anyone doubts my POV, consider this:

I’m going to ignore your incorrect use of terminology, since it’s not important to this discussion.

Do those refugees who applied for asylum outside the US get a loan to pay for transportation to the US before or after they are awarded asylum?

One of the reports last week of the conditions in one of these places came from the Associated Press, which interviewed a team of lawyers who visited a facility near El Paso. The lawyers interviewed 60 children, and had a few more than a couple of anecdotes.

Do you think the AP is not credible? Or maybe the team of lawyers is not credible?

Perhaps you have a cite that can refute the claims made by the team of lawyers and reported by the Associated Press?

You realize that the Administration argued that toothpaste, soap, and blankets are not required at these facilities?

I find it difficult to make a distinction between actively killing people incarcerated and actively creating conditions for incarcerated people in which the perpetrator knows or should know incarcerated people will die in those conditions.

And, yes, these facilities are concentration camps, just as WW2 internment camps were. All death camps in WW2 were concentration camps. That does not mean all concentration camps were/are death camps. But, hey, give Trump and his flacks a few more years and that distinction will likely just be academic.

How would you build detention facilities that don’t meet the definition of “mass detention of civilians without trial”?