Not this. Complaints regarding the administration of the MB go in the Pit, not Great Debates. If you want to gripe about our choices in moving threads, go do it there.
You’re asking about why topics get moved. That’s a question regarding the Straight Dope administrator. That’s why your topic is here. As for your other thread, it’s here because it also asks about why we (the administration) allow certain types of behavior. Or at least, that’s what I THINK it said. I frequently don’t even read your posts, they are too difficult to understand. Frankly, I’m not inclined to spend half an hour trying to figure out what you mean.
A great debate is something that you are incapable of participating in, much less generating. Trust me. Stick with your strengths, bj0rn: being a punching bag for the Pit dwellers.
Let me explain something to you, bj0rn. “What is a Great Debate” is not a great debate, since the answer is in writing on the message board. You can go look at it. It’s not up for discussion.
Granted, a discussion about the value of sarcasm in writing (not so much irony, since it’s basically the backbone of countless great literary works) could exist in the GD forum if it were set up by someone a wee bit more competent. What you remind me of is a person from Plato’s Cave (the Pit), who, upon emerging, is both blinded and fairly confused. Just stay in the Pit, it suits you.
“History will be kind to me, for I intend to write it.” -Winston Churchill
I did not say that. Your thread does NOT meet the qualifications of a great debate. I said that a GD thread on the topic was plausible, but only if it did not involve you in any way.
“History will be kind to me, for I intend to write it.” -Winston Churchill
my oh my…two of my favorite posters writing to me…
its always nice one is being judge from the view of perfection. it makes the goal look so close.
because i am expecting different answers to the question “what is a great debate?” and provided examples from the moderators(which was considered to be a complaint). i belived that the all answers could be “correct” but debatable. hence my thread in the great debates.
A Great Debate is:
“For long-running discussions of the great questions of our time, e.g., man’s fate, free will vs. predestination, Kirk vs. Picard. This is also the place for religious debates and (if you feel you must) witnessing.”
End of story. So there you have it, bj0rn, a concrete in-writing answer to your question. Erego, the question (“what is a great debate”), is not a Great Debate.
Coldfire, try speaking in bj0rnese: debate is criteria of great debate but poster does not have logic and so cannot create. debate is pen and so illogical cannot realize communication. or is it not possible?
Rousseau- cup of soup?
“History will be kind to me, for I intend to write it.” -Winston Churchill
so, because its not in the list, it cant be a great debate eh?
should i have said “how do you define a great debate?” or “what charecterizes a great debate?”. i really do not think i matters. for almost every subject can be “debated greatly”.