This is a spin off from my naked neighbors thead. The thing that confuses me is that I thought that any couple who makes the choice to be faithful and loving is traditional.
I didn’t know that gender should be involved as long as they were committed and faithful.
I think you’re confusing the meanings of traditional and legitimate. The current judgment (correct, in my opinion) that same-sex couples have as much right to be together as homosexual ones does not change the fact that, in Western history, marriage has been seen as teh union of one man and one woman.
Actually I think being faithful and loving isn’t very traditional, historically speaking, since it is only recently the majority of people married principally for love. At any rate, if someone said that another couple was “traditional” I would assume they meant traditional heterosexual gender roles, ie, husband = wage earner, wife = child bearer/carer.
You can’t say something is traditional when until recently it was entirely socially unacceptable. You can say its great, necessary, socially important, or whatever. But you can’t say something is traditional unless there is some “tradition” (ie, social habit developed over a long period of years) that it occurs.
Like, the Tradition on Thanksgiving is to have turkey. if someone says “we had a traditional Thanksgiving dinner” it includes turkey. It doesn’t include vegan tempeh stir fry. It’s great that you made it so vegans could join you at Thanksgiving dinner. But it isn’t traditional.