No, but not all structures are houses, just as not all lives are human. The question on the table is whether a fetus is a human life; no one is disputing that it is alive.
Re-read your remark to **Diogenes ** concerning the human DNA of a fingernail.
This is just blathering here. You have demonstrated no corellation between a house and a baby other than that at some point a thing that is not a house becomes a house, and at some point a thing that is not a baby becomes a baby, which is pretty much what I have been arguing all along.
I specifically did not include a roof. That was my point-that even though an unfinished house is a structure, without a roof it is not a house. This is where equivocating gets you. You end up contradicting yourself without even realizing it.
Everyone accepts the possibility that pregnancy may result from sex. Everyone accepts that a baby may result from pregnancy. Some people think that it’s acceptable to terminate a pregnancy in the early stages.
Irritating message board shitstains like yourself think they can accomplish something by playing semantic games to try to trap pro-choice people into admitting that abortion is murdering babies. It never has and never will accomplish anything, although you will make a lot of people realize you’re a dipshipt moron.
And what, exactly, are “our ends”? What nefarious purpose do pro-choice people hope to achieve by saying “if you do allow your pregnancy to result in a baby, both parents should help support it”?
You need to make up your mind. My arguments (which, granted, are not exactly in line with the OP) you address and argue down to the last detail. Jenaroph and kayla’sdad both stayed on topic. One you ignored, the other …wait, what was your detailed and on topic response? Oh, yeah…
Jenaroph explained in graphic detail just why pro-choice advocates feel the OP of that other thread should take responsibility for his own actions, and how they are not inconsistent with a pro choice stance. So far, you’ve done the equivalent of putting your hand over your ears, closing your eyes and shouting “I’M NOT LISTENING!”
If you don’t want to hear the answer, why ask the question?
Oh, and don’t threaten me again. If you want to have the mod close it, have the mod close it. You’re not a Sunday school teacher, and we are not your class.
If you have a baby, it is your moral responsibility to care for it.
A fetus is not a baby.
If a woman gets pregnant, she can abort it, because it is not yet a baby, and therefore she has no responsibility to care for it.
If a guy is going to have sex with a woman, he has to accept the possibility that she might get prgenant, and she might choose not to have an abortion. This is something every guy must take into account before he fucks a woman. If he doesn’t want to take the risk that he may, eventually, become responsible for a baby (as opposed to a fetus) then he shouldn’t have sex.
Okay, do you get it now? There is no flip-flop here, you fatuous moron. The pro-choice position is, in fact, completely consistent.
“You mean where I said, “Human DtC, is an adjective, as well as a noun”?”
is
It’s not a link.
It’s not by DtC.
And it isn’t something that was inexactly worded.
Thanks for the compliment Giraffe. You just told Miller that I’m not a halfwit. If I was a halfwit, you wouldn’t have said I would post a link to a post by Diogenes in which something was inexactly worded. At least I know someone is on my side. I appreciate the company.
Wow, you’ve really put me in my place, haven’t you? I can’t believe I implied that you were a nitpicking halfwit incapable of reading and responding to the actual ideas contained in other people’s posts. Boy, is my face red.