I disagree with this claim. I feel Democrats still see Bush as a bad President and his policies were generally wrong. We can do this while also recognizing that Trump is worse.
This. Someone with the skill and competence to appear to be a “good guy” but who really isn’t. A villain with actual diplomatic skills. And someone who can offer something to everyone, so he isn’t limited to a base of only 1/3 of the people: someone who can make at least 50% of us grudgingly happy. An actual “uniter not a divider” with the unity being of a evil, greedy, harmful nature.
To paraphrase Tolkien, someone who seems fair but is foul.
Jim Jordan, probably because I’ve only ever seen him questioning people on various House committees and thus I’ve literally never seen him do anything at all except sneer at Democrats.
How would that make Trump look good, you ask? Well, I guess maybe it wouldn’t, but I at least have the vague impression that Trump changes it up every once in a great while.
This might be Yoshihide Suga, new PM of Japan, perhaps. See this post I made in this forum a few days ago:
. . . ess control-freak, mired in corruption and scandal, with ties to yakuza, squelching the press and any reporters who ask too many questions, and likewise any bureaucrats who don’t toe his line. Also squelched a rape accusation against one of his buddies.
Sounds to me a lot like the hypothetical “next Trump only competent” that we’ve worried about in other threads here.
I was going to jokingly say the president in “Idiocracy”, but he at least listened to and followed the advice of an “expert”— to stop watering crops with Brawndo and use water.
Zombie James Buchanan rises from the grave, wins a second term, and is a major contributing factor to yet another civil war that kills 2% of Americans.
In order to make the current so-called administration “look good”, you’re going to need no less than a Jonestown type situation. Minimum. And this current idiot has a situation not very far from that, anyway. The airplane with the congressman has just landed at the airfield, if you will.
A president who has all the bad qualities of Trump, but who is more guileful and more competent at pushing his nefarious agenda.
Or, a president who has all the bad qualities of Trump, but who gets us into a huge war.
Trump has done a significant amount of damage, but I think that, in some ways, his being a blundering idiot has limited the amount of damage he’s been able to do.
I know most people aren’t taking this thread seriously, but the answer is, simply, another war. Trump, for all his faults, has not been a warmonger at all. If he’s re-elected I don’t expect him to start being one. He just doesn’t seem to be interested in it.
To take it even more seriously: Nothing, in a world where historians are allowed free expression, could made Donald J. Trump look good. Does James Polk make Trump look good because Polk was guilty of aggression against Mexico? Of course not. It just reminds us that there has been more than one bad U.S. president.
Did Mao make Chiang Kai-shek look good? Of course not. Both were very bad leaders of China, even though Mao was worse.
However, there is one kind of future president that could, at least inside the United States, make The Donald look good. It is a future dictator president who outlaws criticism of DJT. Consider: