What music does one have to be familiar with to be considered "well listened"?

I remember seeing a similar thread for literature, and thought it would be interesting to do for music, as well. To be included are stuff that was influential in shaping its genre, as well as to stuff that can be pointed to as the height or a significant part of a movement, as well as stuff (most likely songs) that are just so well known as to be iconic. Let’s limit this to the last 50 years or so, and you can choose to nominate artists, albums, or songs, whichever you prefer. All genres welcome.

I’ll get it started, I suppose, though I’m definitely not the best person for this. Some random shots in the great wide ocean:
Groups:

Beatles (duh)
Rolling Stones
Aerosmith
Led Zeppelin
Simon and Garfunkel
David Bowie and Queen
Sting
Elton John
Billy Joel
Eric Clapton
U2
Fleetwood Mac
REM
Pink Floyd
Frank Zappa
Elvis Costello
Velvet Underground (Lou Reed)
Grateful Dead
Kate Bush
Green Day
Bob Dylan
Garth Brooks
Nirvana
Radiohead
Enya
Bob Marley
Bjork
Metallica
The Temptations
Michael Jackson (and Jackson 5)
Madonna
Boys to Men
Outkast
Dave Matthews Band
Yanni
Norah Jones
Big Bad Voodoo Daddy

Yeah, I know, this list seems kind of random and reflects Grand Canyon-sized gaps in my music knowledge. I know virtually nothing about modern classical and jazz, salsa and other Latin-influenced music, rap, country, etc. Dispel my ignorance, please!

Well, just from the 60’s you left out the Beach Boys, the Kinks, the Who, Creedence Clearwater Revival, the Moody Blues…

And I guess they’d be within the last 50 years: Elvis Presley, Johnny Cash, Jerry Lee Lewis, Chuck Berry, Buddy Holly, Little Richard.

Stevie Wonder is a must.

All of the musicians appearing in The Blues Brothers.

Instead of just Sting, I would have put Sting and the Police. And included at least one or two other examples of 80’s pop/rock. (Duran Duran? Culture Club? Men at Work?)

Seems to me the list could use another example or two of punk (the Clash? the Ramones?), prog-rock, 70’s singer-songwriters (James Taylor? Jackson Browne?), maybe arena rock (Styx? Jourmey?), ska and/or reggae…

The Eagles?
Tom Petty?
ELO?

Instead of making your own list, why not just look at the Rock & Roll Hall of Fame? Or one of those “100 Greatest…” lists that music mags like Rolling Stone publish? Or, heck, just listen to Weird Al’s polka medleys? :stuck_out_tongue:

I certainly don’t know everything and my ignorance could also use a lot of dispelling. However, I’ll give it a shot.

Jazz: it depends on what you like. I like Branford and Winston Marsales. Winston in aprticular does some very nice jazz fusion. I also like Marcus Roberts–he’s another jazz fusion musician. Anything by Stanley Jordan is well worth a listen to and Wes Montgmoery is a must. Take 5 by Dave Brubeck is unbelievable. Miles Davis and Coltrane are required listening; however, i find they sometimes get a little too esoteric for my tastes–even though they are total masters. I also like the Neville brothers although they might be considered R&B as well.

Latin-influenced music: Gypsy Kings. very, very good. Mana’ is also very good. B-tribe is more electronica but they have some very apparent flamenco influences. They kind of sound like enigma goes to Spain to me. Eros is Italian, but I found his “best of” album is quite good if a bit overly-produced.

Modern classical: I don’t listen to much of this if you are referring to composers. Individual musicians I like, on the other hand, include Yo-Yo Ma and John Williams (might be one of the more underrated guitarists since its over-shadowed by his cunducting). Maybe someone can chime in on this subject…

Just for fun: blues:
You can start with Robert Johnson and the other delta blues players, but I think most people find their music difficult to listen to at first. I would start with someone like muddy waters. He is a very appealling, “modern” blues player that really defined many of the players who followed him. I would also recommend B.B., Buddy Guy, Albert Collins, Robert Cray, SRV of course, Johnny Winters, Freddy King, et cetera.

Also, for fun, I would check out some new age like early Michael Hedges or anything off the Windham Hill record company. They have some very good stuff and some bad stuff.

Anyway, that’s my .02. :slight_smile:

I don’t think you can be well listened if you limit yourself to music of the last 50 years. My criteria would be

If you can differentiate between music by Motzart, Beethoven, Tchycovsky, and Wagner.
If you can differentiate between bebop, blues, gospel and soul.
If you have some understanding of the evolution of popular music from blues and country roots to Elvis and Beatles, to Rock, to Punk, to New Age, to Rap.
If you can name groups and music in many different genres and explain their qualities even if you don’t particularly like their music.

I think that would be the key to being well listened. Not a set of albums, as it is possible to be well listened having never heard the whole of Srgt Peppers Lonely Hearts Club Band, The Dark Side of the Moon, Joshua Tree, London Calling, or OK Computer. But I would expect someone well listened to recognise the style and probably the artists involved in all those albums I listed.

Some of the great post-punk/new wave/alternative bands of the 80s/90s:

The Cure
Dinosaur Jr.
Joy Division
My Bloody Valentine
Pixies
Radiohead
Sonic Youth

Classical music of the past 50 years…hmmm…no particular order:

Stockhausen
Berio
Xenakis
Ferneyhough
Lutoslawski
Adams
Messiaen
Dillon
Ustvolskaya
Part
Early Max Davies & Birtwistle
1960s Reich
Britten
Schnittke
Shostakovich
Gubaidulina

Who do you want to consider you well-listened?

Knowing the big names in jazz, classical, and the blues is a good start, and most people would probably consider you well-listened. But beyond that, you need to define your peer group.

Yanni ?

Y’know, I was just thinking that, paradoxically enough, in order to be “well-listened” a person ought to have at least one or two esoteric favorites they’re familiar with—artists that 95% of the people haven’t heard of and who don’t make it onto best-of lists.

I took the OP to be interested in contemporary music; but if you want to be familiar with music, period, Bippy’s advice is good. In particular when it comes to classical music, I’d recommend familiarizing oneself with the all-time great composers/compositions before worrying about what’s come along in the last 50 years or so.

Sorry, that was obnoxious. :smack: :o

You would probably get a shorter list asking who not to listen to.

Trouble is, most people who try this run out of time and die before they’ve got past 1920 :wink: . Of the composers I listed, I could highlight pieces from each which have plenty of appeal for somebody who knows zilch about anything pre-20th century. I find it shameful and self-important when people defend modern classical music as something that needs to be ‘understood’ in some historical context.

Gorillaman why no mention of Philip Glass? I can see Taverner being a bit too derivative to list, but can’t think of a reason not to mention Glass.

I’d be interested in seeing this, whether anybody else would or not. I know some works from the second half of the 20th century that are good, enjoyable, and substantial; but I don’t know what, if any, has emerged as “canonical” or “iconic” or the kind of thing that everybody in at least that corner of the musical world would be familiar with. (The first half of the 20th century is a different story!)

well in my estimation you must have listened to, and be able to discuss classical, blues, jazz, rock, folk, punk, reggae, ska, indie, alternative, hiphop, motown, rap (yes there is a difference between rap and hip hop). Feel free to skip Pop, although you really should listen to early michael jackson. You know on second thought don’t skip pop just listen to it all so you realize how bad it really is.

Now heres the real key to being a music snob, you’re not allowed to really like ANY of it. Just talk shit about how bad it all is. Even music that you like, make the disclaimer that whatever band it is sold out and totally sucks, but you still enjoy the music.

After this you’ll be ready to DJ college radio.

Punk, hiphop, rap, and ska but no metal? Where’s the love…er, hate?

sorry, to me Metal is intertwined with Rock. But I can see how making a distinction between rap and hip hop and not making one between metal and elvis is a pretty big mistake.

Hmm… Bippy has a good point in that being familiar with genres may in some cases be more valuable than knowing any particular folks in those genres. Also the differentiation-between-styles and evolution criteria, but that’s kinda hard to quantify…

Let’s do this by genre, then, and we may as well take off the past 50 years limit. But keep in mind that this is to be generally well-listened, and not well-listened within any particular genre. Including your posts, here’s a preliminary list…
Classical

Beethoven
Bach
Mozart
Chopin
Rachmaninov
Lizst
Vivaldi
Wagner
Tchaikofsky
Mendelssohn
Strauss
Gershwin
Dvorak
Brahms
Handel
Pachelbel (if only for that ubiquitous canon)
Shostakovich?
Debussy?
Yo-yo ma?
Pop/Rock:

Elvis
Beatles
Rolling Stones
Beach Boys
Kinks
Creedence Clearwater Revival
The Moody Blues
Chuck Berry
Buddy Holly
Stevie Wonder
Little Richie
Jerry Lee Lewis
The Who
Aerosmith
Led Zeppelin
Simon and Garfunkel
David Bowie and Queen
The Eagles
Duran Duran
Depeche Mode
Sting and Police
Elton John
Billy Joel
Eric Clapton
U2
Fleetwood Mac
REM
Pink Floyd
Velvet Underground (Lou Reed)
Grateful Dead
The Temptations
Kate Bush
Red Hot Chili Peppers
Michael Jackson (and Jackson 5)
Madonna
Dave Matthews Band
Folk?

Bob Dylan
Punk/New Wave/Alternative/Grunge/Metal (distinctions here often elude me)

The Cure
Dinosaur Jr.
Joy Division
My Bloody Valentine
Pixies
The Clash
Radiohead
Sonic Youth
Elvis Costello
Green Day
Frank Zappa?
Weezer
Bjork
Nirvana
Metallica
Country (I really have no clue)

Johnny Cash
Garth Brooks?
New Age?

Enya
Enigma?
Yanni?
Reggae (no clue)

Bob Marley
R&B (who’s important here?)

Boys to Men
Rap/Hip Hop (no clue, really)

Vanilla Ice?
Puff Daddy?
Tupac?
Outkast
Eminem?
Latin-influenced

Gypsy Kings
Mana
Carlos Santana?
Crooners (what do you call this?)

Frank Sinatra
Nat King Cole
Dean Martin
Bing Crosby
Burt Bacharach
Norah Jones
Dance/Trance/Techno (no clue)

Jazz

Louis Armstrong
Duke Ellington
Miles Davis
Thelonious Monk
Benny Goodman
John Coltrane
Dave Brubeck
Ella Fitzgerald
Glenn Miller
Winston Marsales
Marcus Roberts?
Branford?
Wes Montgomery
Big Bad Voodoo Daddy
Blues

Robert Johnson
BB King
Buddy Guy
Albert Collins
Robert Cray
SRV
Johnny Winters
Freddy King
Any glaring omissions? Anything that should be taken out (seems like we could cut out quite a bit, esp. from pop/rock)? Any genres that should be clarified/added/deleted (what really is soul, bebop, gospel? how do you divvy up the various alternative rock genres)?

This may be getting a bit much, but the whole point is to get a rough idea of and listen to the essentials in each genre…

I can chime in on country music a bit.

One should have a passing familiarity with Johnny Cash, Waylon Jennings, Marty Robbins, Chet Akins, Porter Wagonner, Loretta Lynn, Roy Rogers & Sons of the Pioneers, Hoyt Axton, Flatt & Scruggs, Hank Williams, Sr., Patsy Cline and Willie Nelson.

It might be useful to be able to tell the difference between bluegrass, western swing and “Opry” country, too.

Well, metal is the only musical form that I know really well, so I’ll write on that. Impressing the average person is really easy, because they barely know anything. Just mention a few bands like Morbid Angel, or Carcass, or Dissection, or really anything that sounds vaguely gross and/or Satanic, and they’ll fear you.

Impressing your metalheads is a little tougher. Basically, you have to pick a style and get to know it really well. There are five basic styles that break down into about 30 genres, so you’ve got a little bit of work ahead of you.

That makes it a little tough to write a list, cause even if I limit myself to two major bands per genre, that’s still 60 or so bands. I don’t feel like writing that out, and nobody probably feels like reading it all.

At the very least, I’d say you need to understand the difference between black metal and death metal (and grindcore if you’re adventurous); to be able to roughly point to when Black Sabbath’s influence overtook Led Zeppelin’s; and to be able to explain why Metallica’s recent work has drawn such ire.