If your daughter is too young to have her own membership, she can’t post here. (She must be at least 13 years old to have her own screen name, which is required to post here.)
At the present time we are not able to offer “Family” memberships.
You should not post for your daughter or allow her to post her under your name.
Okay, what does “post for” mean? If a family member has a question, must we pretend it’s actually OUR question? We can’t say, “FamilyMember wants me to ask this to you guys” or “FamilyMember just passed by and noticed the thread and said, ‘Buncha geeks!’”? Are we now required to not allow any family member to have any interaction without paying up? Is this like the “no sharing” rule at a restaurant?
No, NO makeup from that blonde who looks like a stripper trying to look classy. Not for GR, no way. And no haircut (he has no hair–doesn’t he?)
It may be fashion, but it’s gotta be Real, ya know? I say upgrade the tunic to black silk, perhaps with a gathered neckline and some kickpleats. The scythe should be well honed and clean and proportionate to GR. And he needs sandals–leather, baby.
A diverting 25-post thread lauched by a delightful OP – a ten-year-old might do worse. Millical, your voice comes through – a real trick in writing. Your proposition is not stale and you support it with originality. It attracted a couple real slick responses. Some people … might benefit by endeavoring to emulate such an accomplishment.
Or when we’re in GQ and want to settle an argument between two friends (one of whom is not a member) does the other person have to sign up before we can post a thread
or did you just get a complaint from that troll that you won’t ban coughTURDUCKEN, and decide to post that?