We are largely learning a bunch of “I told you so” lessons that hopefully will actually stick in people’s heads now.
Chiefly: Political incentives are fundamentally misaligned with pandemics. If you solve a pandemic too early, all you get is blame because it looks like you spent a disproportionate amount of resources on something that didn’t happen. The “ideal” political time to solve a pandemic is to swoop in just as it’s getting serious and then clamp down hard but this is an impossible line to ride. If you swoop in too late, then you’ve opened Pandora’s box and millions of people die.
Decisions around infectious diseases need to be removed from the normal political process and handed over to an independent group of scientists and public health experts who have broad authority to override political leaders. If this sounds perversely difficult to set up, that’s because it is. China tried to set up such a system in the aftermath of SARS and all the expected political type corruptions that the system was designed to circumvent ended up causing it to fail this time around. But to my point of nobody getting credit for stopping a pandemic, at least China has a system like this. How many other countries have tried to even solve this problem? How many times did this system work and stop the next great pandemic? We’ll never know because stopping pandemics is an invisible, unsexy process.
Secondly, global public health is truly global. People are realizing just how much easier it is to stop a pandemic at the source. Sending medical aid to a country is not “charity”, it’s a prudent investment in resources to solve the problem there before it becomes a problem here. We can’t expect any local government to bear the economic brunt of an infectious disease by itself, otherwise it simply isn’t motivated to pour the necessary amount of resources onto the problem. There needs to be a global fund set up that more than makes whole any country that has to deal with the aftermath of a pandemic so countries are actually motivated to reveal problems rather than hide them.
Thirdly, societies in general are unable to take tail risks seriously. So much attention has been focused on wild animal eating in China because that’s the tangible cause of this pandemic. But like, Americans have been told for decades now that animal farming practices and especially the overuse of antibiotics have the potential to cause the next disease outbreak. Or that the anti-vax movement could cause a human reservoir of measles to develop that could mutate into a strain people aren’t immune to. Chinese society has been warned about the dangers of wild animals in the medicine supply in the exact same tone and the response is always the same “yeah, yeah, but what are you going to do about it?”. Removing one tail risk does not meaningfully decrease the chances of the next pandemic, we need to build systematic capability in both attacking all tail risks and mitigating the consequences. Think about it in firefighting terms, at some point in our history, entire cities like Chicago or Seattle would regularly burn down. We’ve stopped that from happening through a combination of fire codes that systematically address bad building practices as well as firefighter response teams that can rapidly move in and prevent fires from getting out of control.
Finally, universal masking might be up there as one of the highest ROI public health interventions ever invented. One major reason Asian countries have had such a better response is because the average citizen had a cache of masks at home like an American would have a box of bandaids and people could get masked up immediately without having to worry about supply disruptions. Meanwhile, Western governments have been steadfast in claiming masks don’t work because they were caught flat footed without enough masks to give to everyone. I hope to see a future world where cheap surgical masks are as abundant globally as a box of Kleenex is and they become a standardized reaction to any infectious disease.
If there’s one bright light at the end of this tunnel, it’s that before this pandemic, nobody believed it would ever be realistic to completely rid the world of influenza and rhinoviruses. If it turns out to actually be feasible and simple interventions like masking, widespread testing and forcing anyone confirmed positive to actually stay at home could bring the number of global influenza cases down to zero, then over a long enough timespan, the lives saved from this will exceed the lives lost from COVID 19.